About UserVoice, my idea was not to duplicate every issue there. Rather do what StackOverflow, or AnkhSVN teams did. They use UserVoice as a place where users can suggest and vote for and comment on new features. IIRC it does not even require you to create an account to vote to suggest a feature. It's interface is also very readable. You can instantly see what features are most popular or requested. AFAIK there's no such functionality in Donjon (at least yet). So, the way I see it, Donjon would stay as issue tracker, and UserVoice would be low friction tool for people to gether feedback and ideas.
Krzysztof Jonathon Rossi pisze: > UserVoice looks interesting. The only problem is that it does > duplicate what we store in donjon and since anyone can create issues > in donjon it partially voids the need for another ideas tracking > system. I think donjon just needs to be fixed up so that it emails the > mailing list for new and changed issues like JIRA used to do. > > +1 for dropping the 2 in the assembly name as we move forward. > > I don't know if the current source repository layout is going to work > very well, because tags and branches really need to be at the project > level not at the repository root, we also need to move the > documentation into the project. Hammett, do you have any plans for > changing the repository layout? > > For example: > /Tools/Castle.DynamicProxy2/trunk > /src > /doc > /lib > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Krzysztof Koźmic > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas > there. I think it would work better than discussion group, and > more people would use it. > Also +1 on calling new version v2.1 > > Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole > Castle project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead > of DynamicProxy2.dll > Krzysztof > > Jonathon Rossi pisze: >> 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion. >> >> So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2? >> >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> >> I'd vote for 2.1 >> 2.0 is very stable. >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, >> should we call >> > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1? >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-) >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell >> what version >> >> > all >> >> > the different projects were at with RC3. >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're >> looking into 2.1 or >> >> >> 2.0.1 >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the >> open issues from >> >> >> > donjon >> >> >> > for DynamicProxy: >> >> >> > http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues >> anymore, so we >> >> >> > need >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to >> make changes to >> >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to >> DynamicProxy 2.x >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > be >> >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Jonathon Rossi >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> hammett >> >> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Jonathon Rossi >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> hammett >> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jonathon Rossi >> > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathon Rossi >> >> > > > > > > > -- > Jonathon Rossi > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
