UserVoice looks interesting. The only problem is that it does duplicate what
we store in donjon and since anyone can create issues in donjon it partially
voids the need for another ideas tracking system. I think donjon just needs
to be fixed up so that it emails the mailing list for new and changed issues
like JIRA used to do.

+1 for dropping the 2 in the assembly name as we move forward.

I don't know if the current source repository layout is going to work very
well, because tags and branches really need to be at the project level not
at the repository root, we also need to move the documentation into the
project. Hammett, do you have any plans for changing the repository layout?

For example:
/Tools/Castle.DynamicProxy2/trunk
  /src
  /doc
  /lib

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>  How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I
> think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would use
> it.
> Also +1 on calling new version v2.1
>
> Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle
> project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of
> DynamicProxy2.dll
> Krzysztof
>
> Jonathon Rossi pisze:
>
> 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion.
>
> So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2?
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd vote for 2.1
>> 2.0 is very stable.
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, should we
>> call
>> > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1?
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-)
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what version
>> >> > all
>> >> > the different projects were at with RC3.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking into 2.1 or
>> >> >> 2.0.1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open issues
>> from
>> >> >> > donjon
>> >> >> > for DynamicProxy:
>> >> >> > http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues anymore, so we
>> >> >> > need
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make changes to
>> >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to DynamicProxy
>> 2.x
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > be
>> >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Jonathon Rossi
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> hammett
>> >> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Jonathon Rossi
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> hammett
>> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jonathon Rossi
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> hammett
>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jonathon Rossi
>
>
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Jonathon Rossi

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to