Patch? 2008/11/2 Gauthier Segay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm not direct DynamicProxy, only using it remotely through MK > interceptors and NH proxies. > > However one thing I find lacking is the ability to proxy a type for a > specific interface when the type has an explicit interface > implementation (aka private members). > > I don't know if it's a concern to anyone but me. > > On Nov 2, 8:17 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I >> think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would >> use it. >> Also +1 on calling new version v2.1 >> >> Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle >> project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of >> DynamicProxy2.dll >> Krzysztof >> >> Jonathon Rossi pisze: >> >> > 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion. >> >> > So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2? >> >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> > I'd vote for 2.1 >> > 2.0 is very stable. >> >> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> > > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, >> > should we call >> > > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1? >> >> > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> > >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-) >> >> > >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> > >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what >> > version >> > >> > all >> > >> > the different projects were at with RC3. >> >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> > >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking >> > into 2.1 or >> > >> >> 2.0.1 >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open >> > issues from >> > >> >> > donjon >> > >> >> > for DynamicProxy: >> > >> >> >http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy >> >> > >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues >> > anymore, so we >> > >> >> > need >> > >> >> > to >> > >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make >> > changes to >> > >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore. >> >> > >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to >> > DynamicProxy 2.x >> > >> >> > to >> > >> >> > be >> > >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> > >> >> > Jonathon Rossi >> >> > >> >> -- >> > >> >> Cheers, >> > >> >> hammett >> > >> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Jonathon Rossi >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Cheers, >> > >> hammett >> > >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > > -- >> > > Jonathon Rossi >> >> > -- >> > Cheers, >> > hammett >> > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > -- >> > Jonathon Rossi > > >
-- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
