IIRC you don't. Actually as far as I can remember this change would require you to overload single method, that collects methods to proxy. You'll only need some reflection, and existing implementation will do the hard work. But I may be wrong. Don't have the code in front of me right now.
Krzysztof Gauthier Segay pisze: > Well I need to learn the A B C of IL generation, which surely would > prove usefull, thanks for the invitation :) > > On Nov 2, 7:18 pm, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Patch? >> >> 2008/11/2 Gauthier Segay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I'm not direct DynamicProxy, only using it remotely through MK >>> interceptors and NH proxies. >>> >>> However one thing I find lacking is the ability to proxy a type for a >>> specific interface when the type has an explicit interface >>> implementation (aka private members). >>> >>> I don't know if it's a concern to anyone but me. >>> >>> On Nov 2, 8:17 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I >>>> think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would >>>> use it. >>>> Also +1 on calling new version v2.1 >>>> >>>> Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle >>>> project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of >>>> DynamicProxy2.dll >>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>>> Jonathon Rossi pisze: >>>> >>>>> 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion. >>>>> >>>>> So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd vote for 2.1 >>>>> 2.0 is very stable. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>>>> > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0, >>>>> should we call >>>>> > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1? >>>>> >>>>> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-) >>>>> >>>>> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>>>> >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what >>>>> version >>>>> >> > all >>>>> >> > the different projects were at with RC3. >>>>> >>>>> >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking >>>>> into 2.1 or >>>>> >> >> 2.0.1 >>>>> >>>>> >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>>>> >> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open >>>>> issues from >>>>> >> >> > donjon >>>>> >> >> > for DynamicProxy: >>>>> >> >> >http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues >>>>> anymore, so we >>>>> >> >> > need >>>>> >> >> > to >>>>> >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make >>>>> changes to >>>>> >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore. >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to >>>>> DynamicProxy 2.x >>>>> >> >> > to >>>>> >> >> > be >>>>> >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0? >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > -- >>>>> >> >> > Jonathon Rossi >>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >>>>> >> >> Cheers, >>>>> >> >> hammett >>>>> >> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >> > -- >>>>> >> > Jonathon Rossi >>>>> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>> >> hammett >>>>> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >>>>> >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Jonathon Rossi >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> hammett >>>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jonathon Rossi >>>>> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
