Thanks for the hint, I will have a spin at it this we
On Nov 5, 7:48 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> IIRC you don't.
>
> Actually as far as I can remember this change would require you to
> overload single method, that collects methods to proxy.
> You'll only need some reflection, and existing implementation will do
> the hard work. But I may be wrong. Don't have the code in front of me
> right now.
>
> Krzysztof
>
> Gauthier Segay pisze:
>
> > Well I need to learn the A B C of IL generation, which surely would
> > prove usefull, thanks for the invitation :)
>
> > On Nov 2, 7:18 pm, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Patch?
>
> >> 2008/11/2 Gauthier Segay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>> I'm not direct DynamicProxy, only using it remotely through MK
> >>> interceptors and NH proxies.
>
> >>> However one thing I find lacking is the ability to proxy a type for a
> >>> specific interface when the type has an explicit interface
> >>> implementation (aka private members).
>
> >>> I don't know if it's a concern to anyone but me.
>
> >>> On Nov 2, 8:17 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> How about creating UserVoice.com page for DP and gather ideas there. I
> >>>> think it would work better than discussion group, and more people would
> >>>> use it.
> >>>> Also +1 on calling new version v2.1
>
> >>>> Also, since AFAIR only IBatis facility still uses DP1 in whole Castle
> >>>> project, how about calling the dll DynamicProxy.dll instead of
> >>>> DynamicProxy2.dll
> >>>> Krzysztof
>
> >>>> Jonathon Rossi pisze:
>
> >>>>> 2.1 sounds good, it avoids confusion.
>
> >>>>> So what do we want in 2.1 and what should be deferred to 2.2?
>
> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> I'd vote for 2.1
> >>>>> 2.0 is very stable.
>
> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>>>> > Since you can't actually download a final/GA/RTM of DP 2.0,
> >>>>> should we call
> >>>>> > it 2.0? Or would you prefer to jump to 2.1?
>
> >>>>> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> >> Yep, that's what we are trying to fix :-)
>
> >>>>> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jonathon Rossi
> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > I thought that was just an RC of 2.0. It is hard to tell what
> >>>>> version
> >>>>> >> > all
> >>>>> >> > the different projects were at with RC3.
>
> >>>>> >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> >> >> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking
> >>>>> into 2.1 or
> >>>>> >> >> 2.0.1
>
> >>>>> >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jonathon Rossi
> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >>>>> >> >> > I just created a roadmap page on confluence with the open
> >>>>> issues from
> >>>>> >> >> > donjon
> >>>>> >> >> > for DynamicProxy:
> >>>>> >> >> >http://using.castleproject.org/display/Tools/DynamicProxy
>
> >>>>> >> >> > I looks like some of the open issues aren't issues
> >>>>> anymore, so we
> >>>>> >> >> > need
> >>>>> >> >> > to
> >>>>> >> >> > close a few off. I'd also assume we don't want to make
> >>>>> changes to
> >>>>> >> >> > DynamicProxy 1.x anymore.
>
> >>>>> >> >> > What does everyone think needs to be fixed/added to
> >>>>> DynamicProxy 2.x
> >>>>> >> >> > to
> >>>>> >> >> > be
> >>>>> >> >> > able to get to a releasable 2.0?
>
> >>>>> >> >> > --
> >>>>> >> >> > Jonathon Rossi
>
> >>>>> >> >> --
> >>>>> >> >> Cheers,
> >>>>> >> >> hammett
> >>>>> >> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>
> >>>>> >> > --
> >>>>> >> > Jonathon Rossi
>
> >>>>> >> --
> >>>>> >> Cheers,
> >>>>> >> hammett
> >>>>> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>
> >>>>> > --
> >>>>> > Jonathon Rossi
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> hammett
> >>>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jonathon Rossi
>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
