Judith Cambell wrote:
> If the mother doesn't care enough about the child to provide for it, why
> should I? Is there some law that says I have to get emotionally and
> financially involved in solving this problem. I don't think so. I isn't
> my problem. I didn't create it and I don't have any obligation, moral or
> otherwise to solve it.
When do you have an obligation? Pretend it's the 40s. If you don't feel an
obligation to help children who are dying because of social/economic
reasons, what about a tyrant who activitely kills them? Is that any
different? Yes, I'm talking about Hitler and yes, that's extreme, but so is
your statement that you have no obligation to your fellow man. When do you
step in? Would you have done so during World War II?
I guess my point is that things aren't so cut and dry. To be honest, I
certainly _don't_ have all the answers.
Raymond Camden
p.s. Judith, I am not calling you a Nazi in any way. I can't think of a
better way to say what I have said above. While I think you are wrong (very
wrong ;), I am not trying to say that you are some evil witch.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
