>
> >>If you follow this logic through - if a woman has a
> miscarriage or a
> >>still birth, then they are responsible for the "death" of
> that child,
> >>maybe even directly
>
> No, if they terminate their pregnancy by direct physical
> action then they are responsible, but a miscarriage or still
> birth is obviously different.
So you're saying that an accidental death is different from murder, but
only in the instances of when the child hasn't been born?
You can't "use" one aspect of the law (saying that abortion is murder)
and ignore another - if somebody accidentally dies somebody under the
care of another, it's manslaughter, and since the unborn fetus is "under
the care" of the mother, then that should be manslaughter as well
I don't see the difference if you're using murder for abortion
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
