> WillBo wrote: > Somehow the definition of campaign staffers has been expanded to > include the doorman and other staff at his condo (Ritz-Carlton)
Hmmm ... well THAT's a little different. If he's using the money for personal stuff then he deserves to be flogged. > Look, the real problem here is going to be credibility. If you're not > on the up-and-up, how is it you can expect others to be? > Agree with you here. > disingenuous... it is either illegal or not. it is either punishable > or not. > I don't agree, but then I'm a big Andy Griffith fan. See I thought Barney was WAY over the top. He would take your position: it's either illegal or not. Andy took the utilitarian approach: law exists to serve society. It's a tool that CAN be used, but needn't ALWAYS be used. BTW - how much money are we talking about here? Because if it's small claims court type jing ($5k) then there a good argument to made that keeping the law OUT is the best course of action. For example, there are many people that make a good living as binding arbiters. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217844 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
