> Hmmm ... well THAT's a little different. If he's using the money for > personal stuff then he deserves to be flogged.
ah-haaaa! > > Look, the real problem here is going to be credibility. If you're not > > on the up-and-up, how is it you can expect others to be? > > > > Agree with you here. ok > > disingenuous... it is either illegal or not. it is either punishable > > or not. > > > > I don't agree, but then I'm a big Andy Griffith fan. See I thought > Barney was WAY over the top. He would take your position: it's either > illegal or not. hey now, Andy was always on the enforcement side of the law. People didn't get away with stuff on his watch simply because it was morally expedient... And as for Barn... gimme the damn bullet! > Andy took the utilitarian approach: law exists to serve society. It's > a tool that CAN be used, but needn't ALWAYS be used. > BTW - how much money are we talking about here? Because if it's small > claims court type jing ($5k) then there a good argument to made that > keeping the law OUT is the best course of action. Again... it is the principle of the thing. -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217856 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
