> Dana wrote: > interested in being punitive than in actually making good policy. > We're done here. >
You always get frustrated when you try to turn your philosophy into policy. So, tell me then, what's good policy? We know Welfare (giving people money for nothing) doesn't work - Clinton and a Republican Congress luckily killed it and proved that to us. Was the death of Welfare "punitive" or good policy? It's consistent with my philosophy, so it's good policy. What you you propose we do? And when you say "fund" who do mean should fund? Because we can disagree about philosophy, but it still sounds to me like you're saying someone else has to pay for it. And under the massive assumption that handing out money to random programs is effective which I would dispute. So, if we're done, it's due to your inability to provide any good solutions that pay for themselves. And THAT would boil down your position to: "The World should better .... now who among you is going to give me your money?" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227745 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
