No, that is not what I am saying at all. Once again, you are greatly oversimplifying everything. So, allow me to do the same.
A "Coffee is hot" label on a cup of coffee does not mean "Warning: This stuff will leave you with 3rd degree burns and a $20,000 hospital bill if you spill it on you." It is reasonable to expect to be burned a bit by a hot liquid. It is not reasonable to expect to be burned that severely. I mean, my god man, skin grafts? Personally, I would have found the woman 50% at fault instead of 20%, but not 100% ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 5:55 PM Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me >> Todd wrote: >> As someone else said, I am pretty sure there is a resting period where >> the >> food is allowed to cool some. > > So your logic is that: > > (1.) Some food has a resting period and some doesn't. Coffee doesn't. > Just because. > > (2.) As part of your food class system, Class II foods (those that > don't require resting before consumption) found NOT to be immediately > consumable entitle the consumer to damages. > > (3.) All of this must be on the label as the consumer is not expected > to know that hot foods can burn you. That is esoteric food industry > knowledge. > > Wow. That's a trial attorney's dream. > > Of course you just raised the price of hot food by 5000%, but hey, > someone has to pay trial attorneys otherwise nobody would go to law > school. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248947 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
