> Todd wrote: > It is reasonable to expect to be burned a bit by a hot liquid. It is not > reasonable to expect to be burned that severely. I mean, my god man, skin > grafts? >
The level of injury is irrelevant. I can kill myself with a toothpick. If I do, that doesn't make Diamond MORE liable than had I simply poked myself. The question therefore is 3-fold: (1.) Was the product reasonably packaging, consistent, for example, with industry standards and/or others that serve coffee? (2.) Was the product as-expected, consistent, for example, with others that server the product? (3.) If injury results, was the product misused? ANSWERS (1.) Yes. (2.) Yes. In my experiments of the last 2 days the low temp of coffee was 184^ and the high was 202^. (3.) Yes. The women put "hot" coffee in-between her legs. That is really stupid. QUESTIONS FOR YOU (1.) When you hear "hot" what do you think of? I think of something that might burn me. When I hear "warm" I think of something that won't. (2.) When you order coffee from McDonald's do you think of "warm coffee" or "hot coffee"? (3.) Are you in the habit of taking sticking hot food and beverages in your crotch? SUMMARY A women stuck a "hot" beverage between her legs and thinks McDonalds is responsible for her stupid act. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248952 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
