> Stroz wrote: > about an impending attack, you seem to take the word of the CIA as if > it is gospel.
I'm not. I'm saying there's plenty of people that told him plenty of stuff and by his own words he knew the danger but didn't even discuss it with his national security adviser. I can tell you what I would've done. As soon as I was elected I would've (1.) Asked for a summary of all threats (economic, military, etc, etc) (2.) Assembled 3 teams to analyze and rank them. (3.) Asked each team to PROVE with data why their top 10 are their top 10 (4.) Commissioned a process team to understand who, how, and why they got their data and suggest gaps & improvements. (5.) Assigned teams to run down all the top threats and adjusted as necessary Given the fact that UBL had an entire PDB devoted to him I'm guessing I'd have had an entire team dedicated to him in Feb. Course I know all of that stuff because I've effectively run organizations before and had to come in blind and show results in weeks. Bush lacked and still lacks ANY type of executive talent or experience which is why he did none of that. All that stuff is pretty much management 101. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299884 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
