What exactly do you mean by 'assign teams to run down all the top threats'?

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Stroz wrote:
>> about an impending attack, you seem to take the word of the CIA as if
>> it is gospel.
>
> I'm not.
>
> I'm saying there's plenty of people that told him plenty of stuff and
> by his own words he knew the danger but didn't even discuss it with
> his national security adviser.
>
> I can tell you what I would've done.  As soon as I was elected I would've
>
> (1.) Asked for a summary of all threats (economic, military, etc, etc)
>
> (2.) Assembled 3 teams to analyze and rank them.
>
> (3.) Asked each team to PROVE with data why their top 10 are their top 10
>
> (4.) Commissioned a process team to understand who, how, and why they
> got their data and suggest gaps & improvements.
>
> (5.) Assigned teams to run down all the top threats and adjusted as necessary
>
> Given the fact that UBL had an entire PDB devoted to him I'm guessing
> I'd have had an entire team dedicated to him in Feb.
>
> Course I know all of that stuff because I've effectively run
> organizations before and had to come in blind and show results in
> weeks.
>
> Bush lacked and still lacks ANY type of executive talent or experience
> which is why he did none of that.
>
> All that stuff is pretty much management 101.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299885
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to