OK, just so I understand for future reference. Expressing opinion ==
trolling. I will be sure to remember that, Thanx.

I still don't understand the equation of 'killing human by negligence
< killing dog on purpose'.

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Judah McAuley<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I did not mean to imply you had called him a 'punk' but others on this
>> list and others I know have.
>
> I called him a punk because he tortured animals in a wanton and cruel
> and repetitive fashion for amusement and "sport". I'll stand by that
> statement. Hopefully he can progress beyond that. That would be
> awesome.
>
>> I hope I am right about Vick, too. He has been given a second chance,
>> to not only play football, but to make a difference in other people's
>> lives. With that in mind, if he fucks up again, I'll be the first to
>> a) admit I was wring and 2) be screaming for his head.
>
> You were trolling Scott. You set up a straw man and begged someone to
> go in swinging, so I did. You want to make the point that Kennedy was
> a deeply flawed man who probably contributed to someones death? I said
> that on here before you posted anything. You want to say that Vick is
> being tried in the public court and being held to a standard that
> others might not be because he is young, black and a professional
> athlete? Sure thing. I can get behind that.
>
> You want to compare the two? Not so much. Kennedy fucked up by all
> accounts, his included. You may not like his "admissions" regarding
> the incident but I've felt it there in the background for the entire
> time I've known of him and I think his words and actions show remorse
> even if they aren't up to your standards. And I do understand the
> standards, btw.
>
> To me, the big difference is that Kennedy fucked up in an accident, a
> stupid one that I could see myself involved in when I was younger. I
> like to think that I would have had more courage and done things
> differently (though there is no absolute account of the night anyway).
> But I haven't been in that situation and can't say for certain what I
> would do.
>
> Vick, on the other hand, was engaged in something that was ongoing,
> that was cruel, that existed over a period of time for him to think
> about the matter, to afford him ample opportunity to change his mind,
> to change his ways. It wasn't a sudden accident and freak out in the
> matter of minutes and hours. It was days, weeks, months, years. That
> is a big big difference.
>
> But I still don't have any problem with him getting a job in the NFL.
> He did his time and I want to see rehabilitation of people who have
> gone to prison.  But you were trolling and trying to compare someone
> who fucked up in an accident in his youth and then devoted the rest of
> his life to public service to someone that committed cruel acts over a
> long period of time and has thus far shown no great understanding of
> the depravity of his acts let alone a distinguished service to
> humanity in any way shape or form.
>
> I hope Michael Vick becomes a paragon of humanity, uses his money,
> power and fame to advance a plethora of worthwhile causes and leads an
> exemplary life. I'm happy to give him that second chance. But to use
> him as a foil for someone who actually *did* those positive things
> while dragging the chains of a long ago accident? That belittles the
> life of Ted Kennedy and cheapens your point immensely.
>
> Judah
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:303160
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to