yeah but it cites scientific journals, which are not the publications most
known for unqualified declarative sentences :)

Still.... I really hope you are right about Vick. Note that I have not
called him a punk, or anything else as best I can recall.

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The closest thing that article comes to showing a 'progression' is
> that 'pet abuse is one of four risk factors for intimate partner
> violence.' That is a far cry from saying if you abuse animals, you
> will eventually turn on people, which is the point it seemed Gruss was
> trying to make.
>
> So, it seems that premeditation seems to be the key rather than what
> species the victims were.  Which seems kind of...odd to me.  I love
> dogs, and I have never once tried to defend what Vick did. Rather all
> I tried to do is point out how Vick killed dogs and people want him to
> never be able to get a job at his chosen career, but Kennedy killed
> another human and it did not seem to affect his career at all. Vick is
> not even getting a second chance, especially when people use words
> like 'punk' to describe him.
>
> The fact that his crimes were premeditated does nto mean that a) he
> can be remorseful about what he did and 2) he can change as a person
> and do some good for others.
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > Because if someone is willing to plan, torture, and kill animals over
> >> > and over again - for fun! - it's only a matter of time before that's a
> >> > person.
> >>
> >> Really?  I am sure you have studies which show this 'progression'.
> >>
> >> I don't but the humane society does.
> >
> > http://www.hsus.org/acf/cruelty/publiced/domestic_violence_cruelty.html
> >
> > Mind, I don't really want to engage on Kenedy's behalf here. Dead is dead
> if
> > you're the victim, as you point out. However, I think we agree that he
> did
> > not get up that morning and say hey I think I will drown one of my
> > volunteers today, right? So however cowardly or criminal his behavior may
> > have been, it was not deliberate, right? It was a huge and shameful
> fuckup.
> > But it was a fuckup.
> >
> > Meanwhile the dogfighting -- I have stayed out of that so far because I
> > ignore football and had never heard of Vick befor he got busted. I don't
> > like to get gushy about animals, thos since we are on the subject I will
> > mention that I used to foster dogs when I had the yard for it and
> probably
> > saved several from euthanasia given how dysfunctional the city shelter is
> > here. With that out of the way, I find that dogfighting does require
> > planning and yes cruelty. At best the man did not think it was wrong, and
> > the question then becomes why would he not. It seems to denote a lack of
> > empathy.
> >
> > Don't mind me though. I realize you two are having fun and I am bringing
> > reasonableness to a pissing contest ;)
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:303150
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to