On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:15 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> "Abstinence only" is just backwards, dude. And, yes, it is sad that >> Bush rode in on the Religious Right, and mostly just gave lip-service. > > Didn't Clinton start Abstinence only? > Why are you hating on religion again?
I'm not hating on them. I said I felt sorry for 'em. They were *used*, dude! Do Democrats, in general, support Abstinence, *only*? >> There were a few things that were religiously motivated though, like >> the stem cell research, which is just *wrong*. > > I didn't support Bush on that but didn't think it was as big a deal as > you did. Seems like there's still plenty of money for it and he was > the first one to dedicate federal money for it in the first place, @Bush, props! >> Was it Kennedy who was like, "I'm a President before I'm a Catholic" >> or whatever? I like that idea. Doing what is right, even though you >> may not personally agree with it, is powerful stuff. > > That's stupid, did someone accuse him of shit like you're accusing > Bush that forced him to say that? Are you that petty that people have > to spell things out for you? I don't think it's stupid. *sniff* As for being petty, shit, probably. Am I evil? I am man! =] >>> You mean the listeners are suddenly corrupt when they don't have a >>> warrant first? Seems like we have other problems then don't you think? >> >> What? Warrants are a check on power, dude. Without checks, we have >> *lots* of other problems. > > And they are still there. Maybe. It's a state secret. You better not be giving away state secrets, man! Loose lips sink ships. >> Most of them reckoned it was torture, right? But you don't care, so >> long as a lawyer tells you it's not. > > You're boring me again. I will not say this country is a failure > because we waterboarded three assholes. NEXT Again with besmirching our fair country! What's the deal, do you secretly hate America, or what? =) *A* failure does not mean "is a failure". NEXT >>> Is that why America sucks to you because we pored a little water up >>> same assholes nose? You really need to get over that. >> Damn it Sam, why do you talk so much shit? America ROCKS! > > So stop telling me it's sucks now because of what Bush did. Heh. Look at that. You just *love* saying America sucks, don't you? Almost as much as you love Obama! >> What crime did she commit again? > > That's cute, try pulling out a cell phone when surrounded by cops > telling you to put your hands up. > ...Forty one bullets, forty one too many... Yeah, it was *just* like that. She's lucky she wasn't killed. >> I'm pretty sure you actually have to break the law first. =) > > Is that from Alinsky? I don't know. Maybe? I thought it was how our justice system worked. But soon maybe all it will take is *thinking* the "wrong" thoughts. Computers are getting freaky! >> Although you support "first strike", so maybe you don't see it that way? ;) > > I never strike first. I always take the punch and then decide how to react :) LOL. Ditto. Too bad more people aren't like us. :-/ >> You're idea of "questioning" is obviously a bit different than mine. > > Different circumstances need different tones Sure. I can't wait till my kid give me an excuse to beat the shit out of her. She hit me with a water bottle tonight, think that's enough? >>> I'm confused, if you think everything is recorded legally what is your >>> issue :P >> Um... *scratches head* >> "Is this thing on?" *tap* *tap* > > Really, why do you claim everything is being recorded legally and if > you think that why are you upset about the overseas calls? Dude! My beef is that it *isn't* being done legally. For sure not in the spirit of the law, but there's probably a good case for letter of the law too. That bit is a state secret tho, so... *sigh* I wish I had been right about that court case. >> Do it! Don't give two shits about what I say. > > You got it. I get it! Good! (a quote-ish from the Court Jester, one of my fav movies =]) >> I don't care too much, but I am tired of people pointing at that stuff >> and saying "See, we are a Christian Nation!". > > They don't say we're a Christian nation, they say we were founded on > Judeo-Christian principles. Some aren't that smart. Some like McCain, and at one time, the Texas Republican Party Platform. Come on. You know this. We're not talking "you", as in Sam (who's pretty smart (for a Republican).) Heh. If you were a woman, I would have said (for a woman). No offense meant to either Republicans or Women. I do think you're smart, period. As I've said before. >> You believe our justice system is capable of being *absolutely* positive? > > Absolutely is a strong word, more like without a doubt, jury takes > five minutes, dna, confession, witnesses etc. Yeah. In my heart, I feel people deserve death for some shit, but in my mind, I think maybe God should be the only one dealing that kind of justice. Or maybe I have my heart and my head mixed up. Anyways, you get the gist. Of course, there is the fact that we are forced to kill daily just to live (plants are alive too)... but that, and abortion, seem a little more personal than "justice", so to speak. >> Happy Halloween! > > Thanks > Yo Thanks! It was good. I was a princess this year. =) :Den -- Nature is an infinite sphere of which the center is everywhere and the circumference nowhere. Bl ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330726 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
