On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But... they didn't give examples. > > They didn't? I remember two in specific: "Gays are gay by choice", > and "I can't tell the difference between Asians and Latinos".
You find those offensive? You need thicker skin. Didn't Biden ask someone in a wheelchair to stand up? What about Obama being clean and articulate. And lets not forget the bitter clingers comment. How about: If you think gay and lesbian people need to be locked up and shot in the head, vote for Bill Brady. I forgot to mention: How funny is it that PBS is finding shit to claim it's hurting the republicans. Tomorrow is going to hurt. > BTW, I just got that huffpo is huffingtonpost, I have read stuff there before. Glad to see you're caught up. > Candidates for the Democratic party were doing that? I see, now we've changed the scope. > Maybe at an anti-war rally. Hell, dude, we almost had riots right > here in 2000-something (real uprising type stuff, not exactly weak > tea). But you thought the Beck rally was bad. > Find me some comments from the comedycentral rally on par with the > comments at the Beck rally. What comments? How about the chick that thinks Bush deserves a Hitler mustache? Here's some: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88Cl7_w7SNQ This is just funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOoIkS5LfpA&feature=sub > And note, @ the Beck rally, people were specifically asked to "keep it > positive", so to speak. Wasn't it like the same three people? > Your side fucking *runs* on them! Do you not see the difference? I see you put too much effort finding and highlighting the nuts on my side while pretending doesn't have any. > A host of reasons, obviously, the least of which being that they had > similar goals. How were the goals similar? One was about religion and government spending while the other was about mocking people. > For a bunch of people that literally preach love, that Beck rally had > some real winners. Three out of 85k to 300k, not so bad. > The beauty, and terror, of our system, is that they can. And have. > "I remember". =) I want to keep it. > You think Stewart was joking when he urged people to see past their > differences? That mainstream media is a big part of the polarization > problem? Restore the sanity? You do get the implication? I think people that take Steward seriously are a big part of the polarization problem. > You think, that because I use comedic effect, I think this is all a joke? Not you, Stewart and Colbert. You did ask how MLK would feel about them honoring him. > Again though, we're talking generalities here, and I think you'll be > hard pressed to find as many Democrats who say shit like "Muslims are > evil", &c. Ah, but how many say Christians are evil? A shitload more I bet. > Less Democratic candidates(!) who talk trash about Gay people, or > immigrants, &c. I don't think so. How about us Jews? Don't the dems always talk smack about us? How many used to wear the white hood? > Ah well. Since they couldn't get their act together, I guess we'll never > know. We do know, they tried limiting the attendants to only supporters and they complained so they canceled them. > There weren't any large scale riots about it, were there? That > generally happens when a large portion of the populace strongly > disagrees about something like this. If they don't riot they don't mean it? We're a bit more civilized than your side I guess. > Keep me posted! Will do. > You see Obama lovers everywhere, don't you? You don't think Stewart is one of Obama's biggest fans? Come on, really. > Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. =) Sometimes it's a...nm > Though you seem to ignore when anyone who generally supports "the > left" criticizes "the left", so it's not exactly fair. You'll still > toss me in the Love Box. =)p New poll, 75 percent are not happy with the direction America is going. It's the economy stupid. Not you. Very few on the left that still believe in him. Must be love. > Really? What about those signing exception deals? Hasn't Obama used more signing statements than Bush already? You do realize they existed before Bush so they didn't really expand. And I never heard of a Cheney signing statement. >> But it's not his faulty because no human is capable of fixing Bush's mess? > See? I can't win for losing. You really, *really* love Obama. :) I was a step ahead of you, I knew what you were going to say. > Post it, yo! It's clear that we don't agree on the health care > reform, but I'm right there with you on this stuff. Post what? > Try me! > > Not that you'll remember 2 seconds later, but still ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330779 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
