On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, denstar wrote: >> >>> But... they didn't give examples. >> >> They didn't? I remember two in specific: "Gays are gay by choice", >> and "I can't tell the difference between Asians and Latinos". > > You find those offensive? You need thicker skin.
My heart is on my sleeve, obviously =) > Didn't Biden ask someone in a wheelchair to stand up? What about Obama > being clean and articulate. And lets not forget the bitter clingers > comment. > How about: > If you think gay and lesbian people need to be locked up and shot in > the head, vote for Bill Brady. I never said Republicans had a monopoly on retarded comments. Just a majority. =) Democrats can be asses too. (lol). > I forgot to mention: How funny is it that PBS is finding shit to claim > it's hurting the republicans. > Tomorrow is going to hurt. Why is that funny? They talk about shit that helps or hurts both parties. It is telling, that it's a pundit issue though, don't you think? ... > Here's some: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88Cl7_w7SNQ Is that the best you could come up with? Awesome! > This is just funny: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOoIkS5LfpA&feature=sub It's funny that you think that is funny. This is just funnier: http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-100-best-signs-at-the-rally-to-restore-sanity >> And note, @ the Beck rally, people were specifically asked to "keep it >> positive", so to speak. > > Wasn't it like the same three people? Yeah, I'm sure part of the reason that "not all Muslims are bad" was a theme at the Sanity rally was because of 3 people. Again, not that there aren't Democrats that are that backwards, the the numbers on the R-side dwarf 'em. I know that because I ran a poll. >> Your side fucking *runs* on them! Do you not see the difference? > > I see you put too much effort finding and highlighting the nuts on my > side while pretending doesn't have any. Again, you can't take the heat, so you put words in my mouth. Consistently. How many times have I called you on it in this thread alone? And the best you can retaliate with is my "they're /Socialists/ ta boot!" comment? I'm sure I've done it more than that! Something is throwing you off your game. Getting worried, maybe? ;) Anyways, I didn't claimed my side doesn't have *any*. Yours just has more. =) >> A host of reasons, obviously, the least of which being that they had >> similar goals. > > How were the goals similar? One was about religion and government > spending while the other was about mocking people. That line break was awesome! Religion and government. Yup. It seemed like the "other" was more about mocking The Media. Are you a big fan of mainstream media now? Can't even support The Media when it's saying The Media is fucked up (which you harp on eternally)? I guess it's all about the messenger, and not the message, with you, neh? =)p ... > Restore the sanity? You do get the implication? > I think people that take Steward seriously are a big part of the polarization > problem. Oh yeah, because he's a freaking Obama lover! (do you see a theme here yet?) He never criticizes-- ok, hardly ever-- ok, well-- still, he's like, *totally* biased! He's like the Limbaugh of the Left! The "implication" is that "activist news", and extremist viewpoints, are hindering discussion. Like what me and you practice. (but mostly you.) ;)p >> You think, that because I use comedic effect, I think this is all a joke? > > Not you, Stewart and Colbert. You did ask how MLK would feel about > them honoring him. And I posted a quote of his about laughter, when you said he'd "love" Beck. Was Beck's message one of unity with the "opposition"? When he said "I tell you right now, we are on the right side of history.", which "we" do you think he was talking about? Do you really think MLK would be tickled pink with folks using Religion as a tool to divide the nation? ... >> There weren't any large scale riots about it, were there? That >> generally happens when a large portion of the populace strongly >> disagrees about something like this. > > If they don't riot they don't mean it? We're a bit more civilized than > your side I guess. I thought you guys were mad ass hell? Didn't you just post a link to a pretty angry dude that tickled yer funny bone? DON'T CALMLY TRY TO WORK TOGETHER! IT'S A TRICK! THE SQUEAKY WHEEL GETS THE GREASE, AND STUFF! I thought your side was "we", as in, you know, the country? Which is it, dude? =) ... > New poll, 75 percent are not happy with the direction America is > going. It's the economy stupid. Not you. Very few on the left that > still believe in him. Must be love. Remind me to put more stock in polls than I do in people again, because I keep forgetting which informs which. He's not the Messiah bro, or the Tooth Fairy... you don't have to "believe" in him. :) Some shit I like, some shit I don't like. I weigh the two. Mix 'n match 'em. As far as the economy goes, which is *obviously* the most important concern we should all have, as, well... the country would fall apart without money, right? But beyond that, I'm fair to middle'n on what's been done so far. If you have trouble conceptualizing why anyone wouldn't hate Obama, maybe check this: http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/ >> Really? What about those signing exception deals? > > Hasn't Obama used more signing statements than Bush already? > You do realize they existed before Bush so they didn't really expand. ... LOL. Ah well. Maybe we can agree on something else. Guess the Executive branch is *just* as powerful as it has always been, in your mind. >>> But it's not his faulty because no human is capable of fixing Bush's mess? >> See? I can't win for losing. You really, *really* love Obama. :) > > I was a step ahead of you, I knew what you were going to say. Heh. It was a good sized mess. And unless you're a kid, two years just flies by. It's funny though, that you are the one who expected everything to be fine so fast, but yell at the top of your lungs (metaphorically), that it's us Obama lovers who held that irrational expectation. >> Post it, yo! It's clear that we don't agree on the health care >> reform, but I'm right there with you on this stuff. > > Post what? Did you read the paragraph before you snipped it? You typed it. =) You said you'd start sharing stuff like this: https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/10/28 So we could could join our righteous rages together, as one, so to speak. :Den -- Our soul is cast into a body, where it finds number, time, dimension. Thereupon it reasons, and calls this nature necessity, and can believe nothing else. Bla ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330785 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
