On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't think so. Ever read Kos or Dowd of huffpo? > > Nope. I'm more of a PBS guy. And on PBS, they said one of the things > hurting the Republicans was all the hate speech they were spewing. But... they didn't give examples. > The PBS folks said it a little nicer though. =) > (Queue the cries of how left-leaning PBS is.) What did they say about all the Hitler mustaches on Bush or the Bush chimp? How about Senator Helmes or his grand-kids should die of AIDS? How about Sarah Palin and her son? What did they say about CBS cleaving a message about finding a child molester at a Miller rally and making that news? Open your eyes: http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/03/29/searchlight-vs-l-a-rival-rallies-reveal-stark-rightleft-divide/ http://www.binscorner.com/pages/d/death-threats-against-bush-at-protests-i.html > Heh. I'm thinking there wasn't much hate to find, or it would have been > posted. There is if you look for it. > Come on man, why do you even try to argue this? I mean, I can see why > you'd want to rationalize that your side wasn't hate-filled, as it's > your side, but still. =)p My eyes are open. There's fringe on both sides, your side use them as propaganda, we don't. >>> Of the two messages, which was more nutty? Which one preached love, >>> and which one preached hate? One was a comedy event with Ozzy and that fatwah guy. Why are you comparing them? > The Beck one was about love? Seemed to me to be more about Religion. > Which isn't exactly all inclusive. What are you going to point to the crusades now and say that's why the rally wasn't about love? > Beck's said America sucks, and needs to be "restored", and Stewat's > said AMERICA, FUCK YEAH! > (I've been speaking in Sam dialect for these conversations, obviously. > We all love America, right?) Too many want it changed. > Which one, honestly, do you think he would have supported? He was a republican you know/ He was also very serious about what he was trying to accomplish. I know it's a joke to you but not to everyone. > Maybe you should edit this Wikipedia page: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalty_oath#Republican_party Why does that offend you knowing how crazy the left is? The constant bleating during speeches to drown out the speaker. The Hitler mustache posters and who know what code pink will do. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2315761/posts http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/003481.html >> Even when the majority says no and you push it through in the middle >> of the night? > > Majority of what? Congress? The House? Constituents, the one's that called their representatives and demanded they vote against it. The ones that argued at townhall meetings causing many democrats to cancel them. The loyalty pledge wouldn't work because they were loyal democrats complaining. > I'm surprised that after re-reading his post as many times as you > have, that you still don't understand what he was saying. Maybe I should take a hit and then read it. > Obama said that he was the King of America? =)p He sounded upset that he was only the president. Don't blame me, I don't have enough power and all that. > I'm messing with you. I bet we can both agree that the Executive > Branch probably needs some reeling in after the Bush fiasco. That will happen tomorrow. See Harry and Nancy do whatever he tells them to. After tomorrow that will change and he'll try to bi-pass them. That's when we start to worry. > I bet you're still claiming that the Daily Show never pokes fun at Obama > either. I think I posted a clip of him mocking Obama. it was kind of shocking but he's still in love. > It's just a few, but my point is, y'all need to talk some sense into > them. Tell 'em to sit down and shut up already. It's hurting your > party, and when one party is that badly fucked up, it messes with the > System. I got a better idea, I won't tell you to control your nuts and you don't tell me to control mine. It's a big country and if you want to judge groups by the extremists start with your own group. > Are you saying that Bush (and Cheney) did not (unprecedentedly) expand > the powers of the Executive Branch? No, they used existing war powers. > Look, I'm right there with you man. Obama ain't doing much to rectify > the situation. But it's not his faulty because no human is capable of fixing Bush's mess? > Which, if you'll recall, is fucking *exactly* what I predicted. > > Thanks for speaking out with me ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330732 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
