On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:15 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Abstinence only" is just backwards, dude. And, yes, it is sad that > Bush rode in on the Religious Right, and mostly just gave lip-service.
Didn't Clinton start Abstinence only? Why are you hating on religion again? > There were a few things that were religiously motivated though, like > the stem cell research, which is just *wrong*. I didn't support Bush on that but didn't think it was as big a deal as you did. Seems like there's still plenty of money for it and he was the first one to dedicate federal money for it in the first place, > Was it Kennedy who was like, "I'm a President before I'm a Catholic" > or whatever? I like that idea. Doing what is right, even though you > may not personally agree with it, is powerful stuff. That's stupid, did someone accuse him of shit like you're accusing Bush that forced him to say that? Are you that petty that people have to spell things out for you? >> You mean the listeners are suddenly corrupt when they don't have a >> warrant first? Seems like we have other problems then don't you think? > > What? Warrants are a check on power, dude. Without checks, we have > *lots* of other problems. And they are still there. > Most of them reckoned it was torture, right? But you don't care, so > long as a lawyer tells you it's not. You're boring me again. I will not say this country is a failure because we waterboarded three assholes. NEXT >> Is that why America sucks to you because we pored a little water up >> same assholes nose? You really need to get over that. > Damn it Sam, why do you talk so much shit? America ROCKS! So stop telling me it's sucks now because of what Bush did. > What crime did she commit again? That's cute, try pulling out a cell phone when surrounded by cops telling you to put your hands up. ...Forty one bullets, forty one too many... > I'm pretty sure you actually have to break the law first. =) Is that from Alinsky? > Although you support "first strike", so maybe you don't see it that way? ;) I never strike first. I always take the punch and then decide how to react :) > You're idea of "questioning" is obviously a bit different than mine. Different circumstances need different tones >> I'm confused, if you think everything is recorded legally what is your issue >> :P > Um... *scratches head* > "Is this thing on?" *tap* *tap* Really, why do you claim everything is being recorded legally and if you think that why are you upset about the overseas calls? > Do it! Don't give two shits about what I say. You got it. > I don't care too much, but I am tired of people pointing at that stuff > and saying "See, we are a Christian Nation!". They don't say we're a Christian nation, they say we were founded on Judeo-Christian principles. > You believe our justice system is capable of being *absolutely* positive? Absolutely is a strong word, more like without a doubt, jury takes five minutes, dna, confession, witnesses etc. > Happy Halloween! Thanks Yo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330724 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
