On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:00 AM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote:
> I never said Republicans had a monopoly on retarded comments. Just a > majority. =) And now you know they don't. That's the whole point of this exercise. > Democrats can be asses too. (lol). We have progress. >> I forgot to mention: How funny is it that PBS is finding shit to claim it's >> hurting the republicans. > Why is that funny? They talk about shit that helps or hurts both parties. Because they're not hurting but they seem to go to a lot of trouble to convince you they are. >> Here's some: >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88Cl7_w7SNQ > > Is that the best you could come up with? Awesome! It's worse than the tea party stuff you came up with. >> This is just funny: >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOoIkS5LfpA&feature=sub > > It's funny that you think that is funny. This is just funnier: No sense of humor? > http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-100-best-signs-at-the-rally-to-restore-sanity A lot of rude and childish insults, not so much funny. > Yeah, I'm sure part of the reason that "not all Muslims are bad" was a > theme at the Sanity rally was because of 3 people. Obviously by your link the theme was to insult the tea party, Beck, Palin and O'Donnoly and praise Obama. It was a very white crowd, kind of surprised none of them were offended by the guy who said Salman Rushdie should die and woman adulterers should be stoned to death being on stage. Almost like the endorse that type of fear. It was about fear too wasn't it? > Again, not that there aren't Democrats that are that backwards, the > the numbers on the R-side dwarf 'em. I thought I just proved you wrong? What will it take to convince you? Oh yeah, the anti-war demonstrators are allowed to be haters because you don't like war. Does that mean you endorse their comments? >>> Your side fucking *runs* on them! Do you not see the difference? >> I see you put too much effort finding and highlighting the nuts on my >> side while pretending doesn't have any. > Again, you can't take the heat, so you put words in my mouth. > Consistently. How many times have I called you on it in this thread > alone? You put those words in your mouth, not me. It was your text. > And the best you can retaliate with is my "they're /Socialists/ ta > boot!" comment? Didn't you put those words in my mouth? > I'm sure I've done it more than that! Something is throwing you off > your game. I'm not bothered by it like you are. You know you do it and I know you do it. Who else is there? > Getting worried, maybe? ;) About? > Anyways, I didn't claimed my side doesn't have *any*. Yours just has more. > =) And that's the problem, you need to realize you're wrong, you're biassed to think that, you are being selective as to who represents each side. You seem to always fall back on a tea-party video that talks to three people out of many. Get a larger sample to make your point. >> How were the goals similar? One was about religion and government >> spending while the other was about mocking people. > > That line break was awesome! Religion and government. Yup. Easily distracted :) > It seemed like the "other" was more about mocking The Media. Are you > a big fan of mainstream media now? The Media? I didn't see one sign of your top 100 mocking the media. Unless you consider Glen Beck and Sarah Palin the media. > Can't even support The Media when it's saying The Media is fucked up > (which you harp on eternally)? This wasn't about CBS, ABC or NBC it was about two or three people that were at the Beck rally. > I guess it's all about the messenger, and not the message, with you, neh? =)p Was there a message? The message was Stewart and Colbert are not funny and their writers suck. That's the message I got. The message you got was the media is fucked up. In what way did they say the media was fucked up. Please elaborate because I missed that joke. > Oh yeah, because he's a freaking Obama lover! (do you see a theme here yet?) No, because if you criticize what Obama is doing you are insane. Ah yes, that was the theme. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-11-01/jon-stewart-rally-shows-how-the-left-blew-it/ Here's a cute bit: The Tea Partiers, in other words, are making a serious argument, which the left too often tries to dismiss by calling them nuts. In fact, the haughtiness reflected by such insults conceals the lefts confusion over how to respond ideologically. The Obama administration has barely tried to argue that activist government can make people more freeby, for instance, guaranteeing their health care coverage and thus freeing them to leave a dead end job. In America today, as at past moments in our history, theres a profound debate underway not just about how to right our economy but about the relationship between capitalism and freedom. Pretending its not a real debate is a great way for the left to lose. He's got a good point and you're guilty of it too. > He never criticizes-- ok, hardly ever-- ok, well-- still, he's like, > *totally* biased! He's like the Limbaugh of the Left! Funny you should say that. From the above Daily Beast post: Maybe its not fair to blame Jon Stewart for all this. Hes a comedian, after all. But hes the lefts closest equivalent to Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck. And while theyre busy struggling to recreate the America of William McKinley, hes acting as if our biggest problem is that people shout at each other on the tube. For a guy as talented as Stewart, thats insane. > The "implication" is that "activist news", and extremist viewpoints, > are hindering discussion. Wow, the Daily Beast (isn't that a left wind publication), just said that's what Stewart is doing. Odd that, from your own side. > Like what me and you practice. (but mostly you.) ;)p Or you. > And I posted a quote of his about laughter, when you said he'd "love" Beck. I didn't notice it. So you think skipping debate and instead ridiculing your opponents, or enemies as Obama puts it, would make Mr King proud? > Was Beck's message one of unity with the "opposition"? When he said > "I tell you right now, we are on the right side of history.", which > "we" do you think he was talking about? The side that wants to talk about the spending, that wants to hold the government responsible for their votes. The ones that went to the town halls last year and begged reps not to pass the stimulus and not to pass health care. But according to you if they don't take up arms we should ignore them. > Do you really think MLK would be tickled pink with folks using > Religion as a tool to divide the nation? Do you hate religion so much that you think it divides us? What ever happened to the free exercise of religion? > I thought you guys were mad ass hell? Didn't you just post a link to > a pretty angry dude that tickled yer funny bone? He was acting. He did make some pretty funny points. > DON'T CALMLY TRY TO WORK TOGETHER! IT'S A TRICK! That seems to be the theory of the left, that's why they canceled the town hall meetings, why they disconnected the phones and held locked door meetings in the middle of the night. 3000 pages that you have to read to find out whats in it. > THE SQUEAKY WHEEL GETS THE GREASE, AND STUFF! We're doing it the right way. Today is the day things get set right, hopefully. > I thought your side was "we", as in, you know, the country? Which is > it, dude? =) I don't know, I'm what you consider the enemy, Obama's word, but I've never been to a tea-party rally and I don't consider my self a member but I will defend them against baseless claims. Sometimes I forget if I'm defending myself or the tea-party and can't be bothered to re-read the thread to find my place :) > Remind me to put more stock in polls than I do in people again, > because I keep forgetting which informs which. Just pointing out your base group of left that criticize the left is getting smaller. Maybe Stewart just needs to maintain his audience. > He's not the Messiah bro, or the Tooth Fairy... you don't have to > "believe" in him. :) Whew, that's a relief, because I don't. > Some shit I like, some shit I don't like. I weigh the two. Mix 'n match 'em. It's the big shit I don't like, I'm sure once I get passed all that I can find plenty that I like. Priorities again. > As far as the economy goes, which is *obviously* the most important > concern we should all have, as, well... the country would fall apart > without money, right? Is that a trick question? > But beyond that, I'm fair to middle'n on what's been done so far. So you like: Health Care reform The Stimulus Giving GM to the Union Oil Spill response Expanding the War on Drugs Expanded wire taping Making people thing the tea partiers are racists His work with Iran > If you have trouble conceptualizing why anyone wouldn't hate Obama, > maybe check this: > > http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/ Scraping the barrel? Nice how you used hate there as if... > LOL. Ah well. Maybe we can agree on something else. Guess the > Executive branch is *just* as powerful as it has always been, in your > mind. Nope, Obama's ending the wars and with that the war powers act. > It's funny though, that you are the one who expected everything to be > fine so fast, but yell at the top of your lungs (metaphorically), that > it's us Obama lovers who held that irrational expectation. What is the time frame you expect a recovery by? And how do you determine that? When should I expect unemployment to drop to say 7%? And how much more money should be give to bank execs before that number drops? > Did you read the paragraph before you snipped it? You typed it. =) Obviously not. > You said you'd start sharing stuff like this: > > https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/10/28 > > So we could could join our righteous rages together, as one, so to speak. You need to start a rant thread and show us some anger, you can't just bury it in a long-winded th ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330796 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
