On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:09 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote:

> There's nothing wrong with nuttery, it's the hate preaching nuts that
> suck.  There are *way* more hateful nuts on "your" side.

I don't think so. Ever read Kos or Dowd of huffpo?

> That video of the comedy central rally you posted?  Chock full of
> people saying Muslims are evil and shit, neh?

We don't hate like your side does, If we did we'd make a BS video and
post it, kind of like you guys did.
Amazing how we're the hateful nuts but you guys spread the hate.

> I remember how happy you were about how many people showed up to Beck's rally.

I was? I thought it odd how much trouble zb went to to claim the
turnout was so few people. I watched a bit of it and thought it was
nice. No big deal to me, I'm not in to Beck or Christianity.

> Of the two messages, which was more nutty?  Which one preached love,
> and which one preached hate?

The Beck one was about love and the Stewart one was about mocking the
Beck one so I'll go with the former. Why so much hate from the left?

> Which one would have been more appropriate for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s 
> day?

Definitely Beck, could you imaging the insult of having a couple o
flame comedians representing anything but a comedy hour?

> And require "Loyalty Pledges"?

Same shit just different heading on the paper.

> All the facts provided are fake?

Very funny, see technically they weren't facts at all.

> "Against the will of the people" is a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

Even when the majority says no and you push it through in the middle
of the night?

> LOL!  I'm wrong?  Remember two days ago, when you were like "Matt was too 
> kind"?

Saying he was too kind is a bit different from:
"no, he's like, the worst thing evah, and a /Socialist!/, ta boot."

> Is that what G Money said?  Spin things much?  =)

You tell me:
 ....yeah, I can understand why people are upset. (with Obama)
Not me ...other than people are fickle, reactionary, impulsive, and easily
molded.

> Everyone makes decisions, but the President is not a King.  Even if
> his lawyer says he can be.

He said that the other day, same day he said vote against your
enemies. He seemed pissed when he said the king thing.

>> They don't criticize him. Nice try.
>
> Could you, pretty please, try to open your eyes too?  This is a
> blatant lie, and one that you constantly perpetuate.

What did they criticize his ties?

> It's like you don't *want* anyone to be even close to balanced.  You
> *fight* to see things in the polarized way.

I strive for balance, that;s all I ask of you. Be honest and stop
grouping the entire right as "hate preaching nuts."

> I know you probably got used to how things worked with Bush, but no,
> the President doesn't make all the rules.  There's these things called
> "checks", which help balance power.

Are you saying Bush ignored the other two bran

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330722
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to