On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:00 AM, denstar wrote: > >> I never said Republicans had a monopoly on retarded comments. Just a >> majority. =) > > And now you know they don't. That's the whole point of this exercise.
We all know everybody poops. http://www.threadless.com/product/428/Everyone_Poops To you 1 instance occurring on one side is the same as 5 on the other, but come on. If that was the point of this exercise, I never would have posted, as the "whoppers of 2010" provided all the data needed to "prove" the point that the Republican Party is worse. >> Democrats can be asses too. (lol). > > We have progress. Yes, because of the Asses, so to speak. Meaning Democrats. (get it? Asses?) The Republicans roll deep on complaints, but shallow on solutions. "We'll fix the economy and create more jobs!" Um, how? Doesn't seem like they've "changed" much, and /they are the ones who got us into this mess!/ "NO!" isn't a solution to the complex problems we face as a country. ... >> Again, not that there aren't Democrats that are that backwards, the >> the numbers on the R-side dwarf 'em. > > I thought I just proved you wrong? What will it take to convince you? Maybe some proof that the crap is piled equal or higher on the Democrats side? Again, there is a difference between a low number and a high number. Why didn't you post any data showing that the factcheck numbers were incorrect? Why did Republicans have the "funnier" whoppers, do you think? ... > You put those words in your mouth, not me. It was your text. My text never stated that Democrats were perfect. In fact, I explicitly stated they weren't. So why do you keep stating that I said they were? ... >> Getting worried, maybe? ;) > > About? Maybe that "vote the bastards out" isn't much of a solution? Didn't we just try that? ... > The Media? I didn't see one sign of your top 100 mocking the media. Did you watch the rally? Maybe just the closing speech? > >> Can't even support The Media when it's saying The Media is fucked up >> (which you harp on eternally)? > > This wasn't about CBS, ABC or NBC it was about two or three people > that were at the Beck rally. Ah, you didn't. Or you would have seen the clip real, which contained clips from all the major news networks. Liberal and Conservative. ... >> The "implication" is that "activist news", and extremist viewpoints, >> are hindering discussion. > > Wow, the Daily Beast (isn't that a left wind publication), just said > that's what Stewart is doing. Odd that, from your own side. Wow, my own side? It must be true then! Polarization isn't a problem at all! Hell, you can look at the legislation and see that voting down party lines doesn't happen much, right? Or maybe we should stick to talking feelings, and what people say. What people do is overrated, right? ... >> Was Beck's message one of unity with the "opposition"? When he said >> "I tell you right now, we are on the right side of history.", which >> "we" do you think he was talking about? > > The side that wants to talk about the spending, that wants to hold the > government responsible for their votes. The ones that went to the town > halls last year and begged reps not to pass the stimulus and not to > pass health care. But according to you if they don't take up arms we > should ignore them. Ah, yeah, the side that has proposed all the solutions, too! There's only one side that really cares, right? You still don't see how that is more divisive than saying "we need to come together as a nation"? ... >> THE SQUEAKY WHEEL GETS THE GREASE, AND STUFF! > > We're doing it the right way. Today is the day things get set right, > hopefully. Yes, the results of today will unite our nation in purpose like never before! I don't want riots, man, I want unity, which is exactly what I've been not showing in this thread. Ironic, that. =) Maybe I should change my strategy? >> I thought your side was "we", as in, you know, the country? Which is >> it, dude? =) > > I don't know, I'm what you consider the enemy, Obama's word, but I've > never been to a tea-party rally and I don't consider my self a member > but I will defend them against baseless claims. Sometimes I forget if > I'm defending myself or the tea-party and can't be bothered to re-read > the thread to find my place :) Eh. I don't consider you an enemy, or even an opponent, really. There is one thing I know for certain: We need each other. ... >> LOL. Ah well. Maybe we can agree on something else. Guess the >> Executive branch is *just* as powerful as it has always been, in your >> mind. > > Nope, Obama's ending the wars and with that the war powers act. Cool! Being at war with terror was a silly idea anyway. We could use the that money elsewhere. Though I don't mind being in Afghanistan so much... >> Did you read the paragraph before you snipped it? You typed it. =) > > Obviously not. LOL. That's ok. >> You said you'd start sharing stuff like this: >> >> https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/10/28 >> >> So we could could join our righteous rages together, as one, so to speak. > > You need to start a rant thread and show us some anger, you can't just > bury it in a long-winded th Totally! I'm there, dude! Right after I go vote. =) :Denny -- Small minds are concerned with the extraordinary, great minds with the ordinary. B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330807 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
