> Now, our intent is to NOT have any more children; so by your > logic, if my > wife were to become pregnant (suggesting the vasectomy didn't work > correctly...it has happened) then we should be forced to deal with the > consequences and carry the child to term? > > Or should we be relegated to just not having sex anymore > because one of the > *possible* outcomes, dispite our intents is pregnancy?
Yes, if she get's pregnant, she should carry the child to term. If you do not want the child, there are alternatives - very good ones like adoption. (Obviously I'm very pro-adoption.) No, I'm not saying to _not_ have sex. But if you do not want a child, it's a risk you take. Everything in life has some risk to it, period. Every time you get behind the wheel you take the chance of death - violent death perhaps. You choose it and deal with the consequences of an accident if it happens. -ray ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
