http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/30/national/main565860.shtml

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93903,00.html

http://www.msnbc.com/news/947847.asp?0si=-&cp1=1

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/08/06/bishop/index.html

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EPISCOPALIANS_GAY_BISHOP?SITE=TXSAE&SECTION=US&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030806_142.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3127913.stm

======================================
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
======================================
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....


| did they elect him? good for the episcopalians I say.
|
| Dana
|
| Doug White writes:
|
| > Good take - and I agree, but it is all  moot now, and the Bishop got his
| > appointment.
| >
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:16 AM
| > | To: CF-Community
| > | Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > |
| > |
| > | Actually, you need to read and study the Bible to understand which parts
of
| > | it to follow.  I'm not a Bible scholar, but I do go to Bible studies and
| > | read the Word to know what it is trying to say to me.  That's a major
point
| > | of the religion that non-Christians don't seem to understand - you think
| > | it's like a set of laws, when in reality it's a mostly set of guidelines
for
| > | following your life, along with some laws, and the Lord guides each of us
in
| > | his own way. Which are which?  That's up to people more learned than me to
| > | figure out.
| > |
| > | But back to the real point - when Jesus the Messiah came, he ruled that
the
| > | Law of Moses was in the past, and that His law - the doctrines of
| > | forgiveness, acceptance, and love - are the new law.  There are definitely
| > | some prohibitions as to some things to do and not do - I don't know what
| > | they are offhand, as I don't know the Levitical laws - but it's not about
| > | picking and choosing what you want to do or not do according to the Bible.
| > |
| > | How does this affect the choosing of the homosexual Bishop?  Let me try to
| > | explain as best as I understand the Bible and it's teachings (like I said,
| > | I'm no Bible scholar, but I try).  To start with, there is a standard for
| > | people who spread the Word - they must hold themselves to a much higher
| > | standard than the people that they minister to, not meaning that they are
| > | without sin, but that they walk the straight and narrow line as closely as
| > | possible.  Next, there are prohibitions against having sexual relations
with
| > | any person outside the bounds of matrimony.  The fact alone that the
| > | Bishop-elect lives with a sexual partner (male or female) outside of
| > | marriage should be enough to exclude him from being a priest in the first
| > | place.  Thirdly, homosexuality is a sin in and of itself in the eyes of
God,
| > | and whether anybody else agrees with Him is irrevelant, it's His decision
| > | alone to make, and that's that.  Openly promoting and living a sinful
life,
| > | whatever the sin, whether it being sexual relations with a man or woman,
or
| > | spreading hurtful gossip, or giving the finger to a driver who cuts you
off
| > | in traffic, is not a trait that men of the Cloth should have. Again, this
is
| > | not to say that these men are perfect, but rather held to a higher
standard,
| > | I would say much like a job promotion - you are better at your job than
your
| > | peers who did not get promoted, therefore are deserving of more
| > | responsibility and respect because you embody the creed.
| > |
| > | One very important point to be made is in all of this, the law of
| > | forgiveness and acceptance is still upheld.  Jesus loves every person on
| > | Earth, and wants them to follow His ways.  He forgives everybody of all of
| > | their sins, although he hates the sin, and loves the sinner.  There is no
| > | prohibition against this man being a Christian, just against being a
priest
| > | or bishop or whatever. God loves us all.
| > |
| > | Anyway, that's my take.
| > | Matthew Small
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > | ----- Original Message -----
| > | From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:37 PM
| > | Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > |
| > |
| > | > So in that case its ok to pick and choose which parts of the bible to
| > | follow.
| > | >
| > | > larry
| > | >
| > | > At 04:39 PM 8/5/2003 -0400, Matthew Small wrote:
| > | > >Actually, Christians aren't supposed to follow Levitical law, but
rather
| > | the
| > | > >law of acceptance and forgiveness as told by Jesus Christ.
| > | > >
| > | > >Matthew Small
| > | > >
| > | > >----- Original Message -----
| > | > >From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | > >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | > >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:30 PM
| > | > >Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > | > > > That's for sure. Haven't been to a good stoning in years. And how
many
| > | > > > Christian men follow the prescriptions in Leviticus and Exodus.
| > | > > >
| > | > > > larry
| > | > > >
| > | > > > At 03:09 PM 8/5/2003 -0500, Deanna Schneider wrote:
| > | > > > >I think the rub lies in the fact that the bible says a lot of
things
| > | that
| > | > >no
| > | > > > >one follows. I read a really good article about it once, which I,
of
| > |
| > | > >course,
| > | > > > >can't find now. But, it basically went through all the things that
| > | people
| > | > > > >couldn't do, or would have to do, if the bible was followed
verbatim.
| > | The
| > | > > > >point was that the bible was written a long time ago and parts of
it
| > | are
| > | > > > >accepted as no longer relevant. So, who's to say that the edicts
| > | against
| > | > > > >homosexuality are any more relevant than these other things deemed
| > | > > > >irrelevant now.
| > | > > > >
| > | > > > >-d
| > | > > > >
| > | > > > >
| > | > > > >----- Original Message -----
| > | > > > >From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | > > > >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | > > > >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:36 PM
| > | > > > >Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > | > > > >
| > | > > > >
| > | > > > > > Umm I said catholic where?
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > > If they want to say yes more power.  I guess they haven't read
the
| > | > >bible,
| > | > > > > > but so be it.
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > > BTW I am a recently converted atheist, after being one of those
| > | flaky
| > | > >feel
| > | > > > > > good pagan types.  I don't want it to be misunderstood.  I do
not
| > | > >believe
| > | > > > > > what the book says, but if you claim it...........
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > > Timothy Heald
| > | > > > > > Information Systems Specialist
| > | > > > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council
| > | > > > > > U.S. Department of State
| > | > > > > > 571.345.2235
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > > -----Original Message-----
| > | > > > > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:32 PM
| > | > > > > > To: CF-Community
| > | > > > > > Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > > In this particular case, it's the Episcopalian Church that was
| > | about
| > | > >to
| > | > > > > > explicitly say "yes" to a gay bishop. Different Church than if
he
| > | was
| > | > > > > > Catholic.
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
| > | > > > > > > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:49 PM
| > | > > > > > > To: CF-Community
| > | > > > > > > Subject: RE: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > Wait. I have no problem with anyone based on sexual
| > | > > > > > > preference, however, how can one claim to be a "Christian"
| > | > > > > > > after the bible says sodomy is a no go, and god killed a
| > | > > > > > > bunch of those that practiced it?  Not to mention is the
| > | > > > > > > church free to make whatever bylaws it wants?  Shouldn't they
| > | > > > > > > be able to say no gay ministers?  I mean the military still
| > | > > > > > > does and that's a government institution.
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > Timothy Heald
| > | > > > > > > Information Systems Specialist
| > | > > > > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council
| > | > > > > > > U.S. Department of State
| > | > > > > > > 571.345.2235
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
| > | > > > > > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:40 PM
| > | > > > > > > To: CF-Community
| > | > > > > > > Subject: Re: Yet another scumbag parent....
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > Isn't that what's happening now, i.e., Laramie Wyoming and
| > | > > > > > > the most recent
| > | > > > > > > election fiasco with the Episcopalian Church.
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > larry
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > At 01:33 PM 8/5/2003 -0500, Doug White wrote:
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > >If we decriminalized these so-called crimes what would be
| > | > > > > > > left for the
| > | > > > > > > >right-wing to do?  Gang up on the homos?
| > | > > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > > >
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > > >
| > | > > > >
| > | > > >
| > | > >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to