Can you explain more about that?

- Matt Small
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: brob
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:10 PM
  Subject: Re: Mel Gibson's "THE PASSION"

  Also take the mistranslation of "The Red Sea" vs. "The sea of reeds" during the exodus

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Michael Dinowitz
    To: CF-Community
    Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:55 PM
    Subject: Re: Mel Gibson's "THE PASSION"

    I can document it with a single word. Michushef. This Hebrew word has a
    meaning of sorceress or witch. i.e. one who uses impure forces to affect
    reality. A type of magic basically. Because of the way Greek is, the word
    they used was basically one who uses herbs or poisons which was translated
    later on as poisoner and on and on. King James has it as witch, which pisses
    off the modern pagans.
    What the word is and what it has become and is becoming over time and due to
    'popular' input shows exactly how the Christian Bible has changed. Yes, the
    original Greek is the original Greek, but who here reads that? We all read
    the English.
    A change in a word can be a change in the entire story. Take my comment
    about the last supper not being able to be the Passover Seder. That was
    probably added later in a translation.

    > Do you have any documentation on that?  I was unaware that the New
    Testament had gone through revisions, excepting translations.  I believe
    that the King James Version and the New International Version were both
    taken straight from the original langauges - Greek and Latin I think.  These
    translations were painstakenly done to ensure the meaning of the passages
    were retained.  Of course, the KJV is only 500 years old.
    >
    > - Matt Small
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    >   From: Kevin Graeme
    >   To: CF-Community
    >   Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:39 PM
    >   Subject: Re: Mel Gibson's "THE PASSION"
    >
    >
    >   Which New Testament though? In translations and editions, the New
    Testament
    >   has changed over time. Is the Vatican II revisionist history or is it
    >   setting right the revisionist history that happened over time to the New
    >   Testement?


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to