Say you did think this guy was the most stupid person on earth; if he were so intellegent wouldn't he have just accepted that, giggled knowing you were wrong, and then worked towards solving his problem - using your perception of him as an advantage somehow? Isn't his mission to solve a problem? Should it matter if he solved his problem with the assistance of somebody who thought he was stupid or intellegent? And if he were so intellegent, doesn't him focussing on other peoples perception of his intellegence say a little something about his intellegence?
People and their egos - so lame.
>So I am sending email back and forth with a client. In the last email
>correspondent with him I stated for the 3rd time the correct email settings
>for Outlook Express. I have been very polite and patient but he replies back
>with this.
>
>
>
>"In spite of the fact that some of the emails may cause you to think
>otherwise, I am not stupid. I have two undergraduate degrees, a master's
>degree, an Ed.D, and 12 months of post-doctoral study, but I'm still having
>problems with things I didn't even do."
>
>
>
>Shouldn't he be able to figure it out him self?
>
>
>
>My reply is "Wow, I only have an AOS in Microprocessors and
>Telecommunications"
>
>
>
>So I think about a 7 year degree and my 7+ years experience, all the people
>I have worked with that made more money and higher position than I did but
>couldn't configure their computer applications. I also think about how much
>I have "matured" (I have a little, I wipe the seat if I sprinkle) over the
>last 7 years.
>
>
>
>I came up with
>
>
>
>Masters Degree is to 7 years Experience as 7 years older is to 7 years
>smarter.
>
>
>
>
>
>Rick
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
