Just wondering.
Well if that's all your taking issue with in that statement, than I guess I
must have done ok :)
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319
The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-----Original Message-----
From: William H Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 12:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 2004 Candidate matcher
> LRSD
Long Range Surveillance Detachment ?
:-)
will
Tim Heald wrote:
> I have some more time to respond.
>
> "that's bullshit my views are what I decide is right"
>
> Your views are often contradictory in nature, and in many cases not
> based on
> objective reality.
>
> "risking throwing our country into another Vietnam for a reason even
> stupider then Vietnam was."
>
> An opinion. Good parrot.
>
> "Do we loose 10-15 soldiers a week in regular duty?? If so show me the
> #'s"
>
> Yes, often times we do, asked and answered.
>
> "You can do all your preaching that you served in the military but it
> doesn't make you one lick better then anyone else. I've seen studies that
> only people who really have no other future enlist into the military you
> don't see me using that to say oh you were too stupid to do anything
> but go
> into the military and you were a loser."
>
> I for one hope that the airmen, sailors, soldiers and marines that
> keep you
> safe and warm at home appreciate this line of thinking. Men like Audy
> Murphy, Colin Powell, Ronald Regan, John Kennedy, George Washington. Your
> supposed civil war heroes as well, that had to reconstruct this country
> after tearing it apart. These are the losers you speak of. I have
> already
> expressed that I feel everyone should either have to serve, or not be
> given
> all of the same rights. I do think that military service makes you a
> better
> person. I know it made me a better person.
>
> "And as well as the fact that we're not at war, we're in a conflict
> because
> of our president I saw support given for him to do what he had to do but
> we're not in a state of war big difference, though the republicans and
> bush
> administration does not choose to think that way."
>
> Once again your literary skills astound and amaze. I am not really sure
> what you are trying to say here. Are you really foolish enough to believe
> that we are not at war? Why because it isn't declared?
>
> "Much less I was talking about losses in the military not your former
> division alone."
>
> I wasn't either. The numbers I sent in were for the entire army. I was
> only using personal experience to illustrate the point.
>
> "People who are a little open minded and do not have a hard head and can
> think freely will always change views. Only a person who is stubborn and
> does not like change will never change their stances or views on anything.
> Back when we were going to invade Iraq I said I guess its the right
> thing to
> do at the time while in the same breathe
> saying how terrible the bush administration is because its a fact they
> are.
> Besides if you think about it there will always be 2 sides to the most
> commonly held opinion. There will be the republican (Right wing) side and
> the democratic (left wing) side."
>
> People who take the time to make a reasoned decision on an issue will not
> often change their mind. They will have weighed the pros and cons of the
> issue and will usually stick with their ideals and beliefs. That being
> said,
> under factual weight, with information I didn't have when I formed my
> initial thoughts, I can certainly change my mind. Also you insist on
> labeling me as a Bush supporter. I am not. Nor am I a
> Democrat. Right and
> left are not the only sides to the issues we are facing.
>
> "If you think Clinton was as bad as bush really go fight his war for
> him and
> think you're doing something for a great man who should be on mount
> Rushmore"
>
> Honestly, I think Bush has probably done more harm than Clinton. We are
> talking about shades of gray now. Why should we continue to choose the
> lesser of two evils?
>
> "But don't you dare ever EVER say or even think you are better then
> someone
> because you served in the military because that's a crock of shit dude.
> That's elitist crap and its hogwash if I ever saw it."
>
> Elitist. Yes I am. I don't pretend that there are no classes in our
> society.
>
> "As for responsibility if someone attacked our country and they needed
> me I
> would be the next person in line to go out but when you have a family you
> know its not always that easy to do."
>
> We were attacked. Our military is also dangerously low for men. We do
> still have troops in a' Stan you know. The Taliban and Al Quaida are
> still
> out there. As are Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al Ansar Islam, The Muslim
> Brotherhood, and all kinds of other groups that wish to do harm against
> America.
>
> "And my reasons for not going through with Perdue are my own and nobody
> else's and how dare you try to judge me because of it."
>
> Self conscious? I didn't know anything or say anything about your
> education. I can't. I didn't even graduate high school.
>
> "i'm tim i have access to stats that normal people don't get oh yes we had
> so many people dieing in training accidents. OH yes on training duty and
> such we always had to worry about the crazy man with a bomb driving
> into our
> building"
>
> I sent in my stats in an earlier email. I do have access to confidential
> information, but I could and would never use it in so irresponsible a
> manner. Also do you know anything about infantry and airborne training?
> Are you saying that I was a garrison trooper? Look at the history of C co
> 2/505th PIR between 1998 and 2001. At the time we were the most deployed
> battalion in the U.S. Army. When did I say anything about bombs? Or
> anything that I may have done operationally in the Army, other than
> mention
> what unit I was in, and what training I had to go through to get there?
> Tell me Bill, what is LRSD. What do we do? Apparently I am either
> making
> up my career (and I have a DD214 if you'd like it, and jump log) or
> it's not
> hard to do at all. Hell it's basically just the boy scouts with camo
> right?
>
> Why you Bill? Why can I debate with Larry and Dana? Because they debate,
> they have reasons for believing what they do. They don't just spew back
> what they heard on the evening news, or around the water cooler. I have
> seen you flip flop on issues time and again. I have sat and listen to you
> complain about what's happening to you, never hearing about you doing
> anything for yourself. I have read your attacks against people on many
> different occasions. How does it feel Bill?
>
> Loathe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:08 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 2004 Candidate matcher
>
> that's bullshit my views are what I decide is right and if you want to
> be a dick and start putting me down well hopefully you won't die in the
> line of duty for a president who
> is in risking throwing our country into another Vietnam for a reason
> even stupider then Vietnam was.
> Do we loose 10-15 soldiers a week in regular duty?? If so show me the
> #'s. You can do all your preaching that you served in the military but
> it doesn't make you one lick better then anyone else. I've seen studies
> that only people who really have no other future enlist into the
> military you don't see me using that to say oh you were too stupid to do
> anything but go into the military and you were a loser. I was in the
> process of joining the navy and in the process of a scholarship to
> Perdue and navy rotc but because I opted for a private job doesn't mean
> jack shit. And as well as the fact that we're not at war, we're in a
> conflict because of our president I saw support given for him to do what
> he had to do but we're not in a state of war big difference, though the
> republicans and bush administration does not choose to think that way.
>
> I liked you alot but for you to start saying shit like that, hell no.
> Much less I was talking about losses in the military not your former
> division alone. People who are a little open minded and do not have a
> hard head and can think freely will always change views. Only a person
> who is stubborn and does not like change will never change their stances
> or views on anything. Back when we were going to invade Iraq I said I
> guess its the right thing to do at the time while in the same breathe
> saying how terrible the bush administration is because its a fact they
> are. Besides if you think about it there will always be 2 sides to the
> most commonly held opinion. There will be the republican (Right wing)
> side and the democratic (left wing) side. On gun control I'm on the
> republican side, on bush I'm on the democratic side etc etc down the
> line. If you think Clinton was as bad as bush really go fight his war
> for him and think you're doing something for a great man who should be
> on mount Rushmore.
>
> But don't you dare ever EVER say or even think you are better then
> someone because you served in the military because that's a crock of
> shit dude. That's elitist crap and its hogwash if I ever saw it. You
> know I liked you alot but people who put me down and talk shit about me
> screw that I don't need that. I'm sorry you're going through rought
> times and all but that's no excuse to be a jerk dude, or whatever reason
> you have is. As for responsibility if someone attacked our country and
> they needed me I would be the next person in line to go out but when you
> have a family you know its not always that easy to do. And my reasons
> for not going through with Perdue are my own and nobody else's and how
> dare you try to judge me because of it. So does it mean since I didn't
> go into the military I am not as good as you? GRR man WTF that was
> really upsetting to me with what a dick you were being to me? I mean you
> can debate Dana till you're blue in the face but with me you just throw
> personal attacks oh yes all the porn and games I jerk off to WTF man
> Jesus. And to even think you have the knowledge or even the right to say
> I swing to whatever the popular opinion is. OHH I wasn't in the military
> i don't know anything, but i'm tim i have access to stats that normal
> people don't get oh yes we had so many people dieing in training
> accidents. OH yes on training duty and such we always had to worry about
> the crazy man with a bomb driving into our building. LOL
>
> Thats messed up
>
>
> --
> Bill Wheatley
> Senior Database Developer
> eDiets.com, Inc.
> (OTCBB: EDET)
> 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> F: (954) 360-9095
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:28 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re:2004 Candidate matcher
>
> Hey Bill,
>
> There is a check box in Outlook that has it automatically spell check
> everything you send out.
>
> "what did Clinton do that came anywhere close to the USA Patriot Act?"
>
> Echelon anyone? http://www.fas.org/irp/program/process/echelon.htm,
<http://www.fas.org/irp/program/process/echelon.htm,> no
> knock searches on federal low-income housing? Mandatory sentencing for
> drug offenders?
>
> "i don't recall getting our country embroiled into a foreign conflict
> that is starting to stretch on with the looks of stretching on
> indefinately."
>
> Kosovo? Bosnia? They don't look to be ending either.
>
> "We might not have had to fight china because of our Last presidents
> charisma and his ability to get deals done and work things out"
>
> If you call sending them every single U.S. patent on CDs and selling
> them a naval base on U.S. property, through which they were caught
> smuggling in hundreds of Ak-47s getting things done. I am still not
> comfortable with the counter Intel investigations that took part during
> his presidency.
>
> "The current president has been anti-un for the most part"
>
> And this is bad why?
>
> "becoming more belligerant and becoming if you aren't with us you're
> aganist us"
>
> That's how I feel. Remember nations don't have friends, they have
> interests, and if your not doing what we want, you're working against
> our interests.
>
> "You are talking about going back onto active duty do you really want to
> be embroiled in Iraq for the foreseeable future with a much more real
> threat of dieing on any given day as opposed to standard non-war
> footing"
>
> Don't talk about this. You don't know what you're talking about. The
> 82nd is currently losing fewer troops than it does during regular
> training rotations from jumps and training accidents. We loose people
> in Eastern Europe, and in Asia, you just don't hear about it. You don't
> hear about the people we lose in support of our foolish drug war. You
> don't hear about the people we lose in Indonesia fighting Islamists
> there. The reason you're hearing about the deaths in Iraq is a
> political one.
>
> I don't want to go and fight anyone's war. I want to defend the young
> troops we have in the ranks. I want to take what I have learned and
> used to try and protect some of my closest friends. Finally, our
> country is at war. I don't have to agree with the reasons for that war.
> The authorized, constitutional head of our armed forces put them in
> harms way. That's enough for me. I am sorry Bill that you don't feel
> that responsibility.
>
> Might take away from you're video game and porn time I guess.
>
> I don't know why I even bother arguing with you. You are spoon fed by
> the media. Your views sway in the wind with what you perceive is the
> most commonly held opinion.
>
> Loathe
>
> >Hrm but what did clinton do that came anywhere close to the USA Patriot
> >Act?
> >And the china stuff i don't recall getting our country embroiled into a
> >foreign conflict that is starting to stretch on with the looks of
> >stretching on indefinately.
> >We might not have had to fight china because of our Last presidents
> >charisma and his ability to get deals done and work things out. Unlike
> >our current president who within weeks of taking office ripped apart
> all
> >the good work done by previous presidents in helping to make alliances
> >and bond the united states with europe and other parts of the world.
> The
> >current president has been anti-un for the most part, anti rest of the
> >world. After 9/11 he became even more so becoming more belligerant and
> >becoming if you aren't with us you're aganist us. You are talking about
> >going back onto active duty do you really want to be embroiled in Iraq
> >for the forseeable future with a much more real threat of dieing on any
> >given day as opposed to standard non-war footing? Dieing for your
> >country is all fine and dandy but remember pattons wonderful quote.
> "The
> >object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other
> >bastard die for his."
> >
> >--
> >Bill Wheatley
> >Senior Database Developer
> >eDiets.com, Inc.
> >(OTCBB: EDET)
> >3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> >Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> >V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> >F: (954) 360-9095
> >E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
> >
> >
> _____
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
