On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Michael Firth <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on the feedback I am getting Builder seems to be very stable contrary > to a few web posts I have read.
I think a lot of people tried the public beta, had problems, and never went back after the public 1.0 release. Their loss, IMO. At MAX, Ram (from Adobe) showed off some of the features that "might or might not" be part of ColdFusion Builder 2.0 (a.k.a. Storm) and I was drooling - I was ready to put down my upgrade dollars there and then. And it's worth pointing out that Adobe are already hard at work figuring out what ColdFusion Builder 3.0 should look like (based on tantalizing snippets of information from the Adobe folks). So it's clear that this is a product Adobe is committed to, is investing in and has a solid future many years out. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341298 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
