I am happy to hear that Adobe is committed to it because to be honest during my time as a SQL DBA the company I was at was into ASP.Net (ah the agony) and I kind of fell out of the loop with ColdFusion. During that time, I kept on hearing it was dying a slow death but after tonight and my first initial feelers I can it still has a bright future ahead of it.
Now if only I can find that job lmao. Just kidding. Thanks to everybody for all the input on this. On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Michael Firth <[email protected]> wrote: >> Based on the feedback I am getting Builder seems to be very stable contrary >> to a few web posts I have read. > > I think a lot of people tried the public beta, had problems, and never > went back after the public 1.0 release. Their loss, IMO. > > At MAX, Ram (from Adobe) showed off some of the features that "might > or might not" be part of ColdFusion Builder 2.0 (a.k.a. Storm) and I > was drooling - I was ready to put down my upgrade dollars there and > then. And it's worth pointing out that Adobe are already hard at work > figuring out what ColdFusion Builder 3.0 should look like (based on > tantalizing snippets of information from the Adobe folks). So it's > clear that this is a product Adobe is committed to, is investing in > and has a solid future many years out. > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341302 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
