Thanks for posting, Jay - that's an interesting observation ! I'm
running Adblock+ on Chromium 4.0.296.0 (35990) on my 64-bit Linux
setup, but my bookmarks load in what I accept in a reasonable amount
of time, i e, some 36 seconds....

Henri

On Jan 10, 9:43 am, Jay Mendoza <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe only somewhat related, but I was having page-loading issues,
> where pages would seem to load for an extended period of time and
> would not respond to clicks or mousewheel scrolling. Disabling AdBlock
> fixed the issue.
>
> Mac build 35890
>
> Jay
>
> On Jan 9, 11:28 pm, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Are you talking about a case where he uses the Bookmark Sync feature? if so,
> > I never saw him writing that he is using it, so the network connection
> > should not a factor in this case.
>
> > ☆PhistucK
>
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:20, mhenriday <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Again, I suspect that with the sheer number of bookmarks you have the
> > > file simply takes time to load, given the limitations of your
> > > connexion. Have you checked to see how large, in fact, your bookmarks
> > > file is and what the downstream speeds provided by your ISP really are
> > > in practice ? To take my situation as an example, he nominal
> > > downstream speed provided me by my ISP is 8Mbs, but in reality I never
> > > get more than 6.75 Mbs, which I understand is quite good for an ADSL
> > > connexion. And if the Google servers are very busy when you try to
> > > load your bookmarks, you can expect that doing so will take even more
> > > time. So I doubt that the problem lies with Chromium/Chrome - unless
> > > it's the case that your bookmarks load much more quickly from a
> > > different browser....
>
> > > Henri
>
> > > On Jan 8, 6:14 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Well it's a 6 Mbps Residential Subscriber service and I use various
> > > > computers. This behaviour was shown in all the 'puters that I use
> > > > Chromium/Google-Chrome on so it's not hardware specific or even OS
> > > > specific as I use a mix of GNU/Linux, MSFT Windows and hardware.
>
> > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, mhenriday <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Sorry, Steve, that I was unable to make myself clear - as I reported
> > > > > in my first posting to this thread, when I checked, I found that it
> > > > > took my 970 bookmarks 36 seconds to load. You estimated that you have
> > > > > approximately three times as many bookmarks ; thus I didn't find the
> > > > > fact that it takes about three times as long for them to load
> > > > > particularly surprising. You haven't indicated how speedy your
> > > > > internet connexion is nor provided details regarding your computer's
> > > > > performance, so it's difficult to know how your figures relate to
> > > > > mine. One thing should be certain, however ; if you significantly
> > > > > reduce the number of your bookmarks, the number that remain should
> > > > > load more quickly....
>
> > > > > Henri
>
> > > > > On Jan 8, 5:06 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> Are you serious?! It takes you 2+ minutes to load 1/3 the amount of
> > > bookmarks?
>
> > > > >> I didn't consider that it was the amount of bookmarks as it was much
> > > > >> snapper just a day or 2 ago; but, I have added bookmarks since then.
>
> > > > >> So, I thought for giggles I'll delete all my bookmarks and see if the
> > > > >> issue persists. It didn't; With all my extensions enabled
> > > > >> Chromium/Google-Chrome both launced in about a second or 2 without 
> > > > >> any
> > > > >> hang.
>
> > > > >> Therefore everything else was  incidental in this; I just have too
> > > > >> many bookmarks. The situation isn't really hardware specific though 
> > > > >> as
> > > > >> the same issue appeared on my i7 workstation. Chrome/Chromium just
> > > > >> seems to have an issue with loading over 3k bookmarks. <shrug>
>
> > > > >> So time to "cull" the bookmarks. LOL
>
> > > > >> Thanks everyone for your input, it helped me to look elsewhere for 
> > > > >> the
> > > cause.
>
> > > > >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM, mhenriday <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > Steve, I doubt it's a question of approaching an upper limit, but 
> > > > >> > if
> > > > >> > you have approximately 3K bookmarks, it's not surprising that they
> > > > >> > take some time to load, depending upon your internet connexion and
> > > the
> > > > >> > capacity of your machine. What you are experiencing corresponds
> > > pretty
> > > > >> > well with what I see with approximately 1/3 as many bookmarks as 
> > > > >> > you
> > > > >> > and with an ADSL connexion with a nominal downstream speed of
> > > 8Mbits/
> > > > >> > s....
>
> > > > >> > Henri
>
> > > > >> > On Jan 8, 4:19 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> >> Hi Tim;
>
> > > > >> >> These are the bookmarks since I started on the WWW circa '92/93 so
> > > > >> >> about 3k. Am I approaching the upper limit, is there an upper
> > > limit?
>
> > > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Tim Steele <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >> > Hi Steve,
> > > > >> >> > Out of curiousity, roughly how many bookmarks do you have?
> > > > >> >> > Tim
> > > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:16 PM, S D Allen <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> Yes understood. Mine are synced to -- I'm just saying the only
> > > thing
> > > > >> >> >> that has changed in terms of extensions/Chrome/Chromium is that
> > > I
> > > > >> >> >> changed the syncing method from XMarks to Google and was musing
> > > if
> > > > >> >> >> Google bookmark sync (application) causes the slow delay on
> > > start-up.
> > > > >> >> >> Since you don't use Google Bookmark sync I guess it's difficult
> > > for
> > > > >> >> >> you to say.
>
> > > > >> >> >> Anyone else using Google to sync their bookmarks, experiencing
> > > slow
> > > > >> >> >> start up on Chromium/Google-Chrome? Just trying to figure out 
> > > > >> >> >> if
> > > it's
> > > > >> >> >> something local to my setup or something else.
>
> > > > >> >> >> Thanks.
>
> > > > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, mhenriday <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> > Steve, my testing was done with the bookmarks synced....
>
> > > > >> >> >> > Henri
>
> > > > >> >> >> > On Jan 7, 8:46 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >> Thanks for the response Mhenriday. The only thing I've
> > > changed
> > > > >> >> >> >> recently is that I reverted to using
> > > > >> >> >> >>  Google Sync for my bookmarks. I deleted the XMarks 
> > > > >> >> >> >> extension
> > > prior to
> > > > >> >> >> >> doing this.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> So, I'm wondering if it's Google Sync doing this on startup
> > > .... I
> > > > >> >> >> >> notice that selecting any bookmark on the toolbar; there is 
> > > > >> >> >> >> a
> > > > >> >> >> >> significant delay before the focus works.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:17 PM, mhenriday <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >> > Steve, on my 64-bit Ubuntu Karmic setup running Chromium
> > > 4.0.291.0
> > > > >> >> >> >> > (35606) , my 970 Delicious bookmarks start displaying 
> > > > >> >> >> >> > after
> > > a couple
> > > > >> >> >> >> > of seconds and load fully after 36 seconds. This on a HP
> > > Pavilion
> > > > >> >> >> >> > d4595se with an AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Dual Core CPU and 2
> > > GB RAM....
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> > Henri
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> > On Jan 7, 4:11 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> FYI: Just checked with *4.0.291.0 (35606) Ubuntu* and the
> > > extensions
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> all
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> load,m (icons appear in top left) but the bookmarks take 
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> a
> > > long time
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> (again
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> over 2 minutes). Again this is on Debian Sid distro. This
> > > has been
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> happening
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> with the last couple of Chromium builds for me.  I update
> > > daily. HTH
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:01 AM, S D Allen
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Folks, I'm on Debian Linux (Sid) and lately I've 
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > noticed
> > > that both
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > the
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > builds of Chromium (from Ubuntu Repository) and
> > > Developers
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Google-Chrome are quite slow when it comes to loading 
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > my
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > extensions
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > AND bookmarks in the Bookmark Toolbar.
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Just now after updating to 4.0.288.1 unstable; It took
> > > over 2
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > minutes
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > to load the bookmarks in the toolbar and the rest of 
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > the
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > extensions.
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Of course the entire interface is frozen solid when 
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > this
> > > happens.
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Anyone else experiencing this?
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > --
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Cheers,
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Steve
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallen
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://picasaweb.google.ca/Stephen.D.Allen
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://www.facebook.com/S.D.Allen
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://portfolio-s-d-allen.blogspot.com/
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://friendfeed.com/chimpanze
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://stephenallen.yelp.ca/
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> --
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> >> Stevehttp://
> > >www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallenhttp://picasaweb.google...
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> > --
> > > > >> >> >> >> > Chromium Discussion mailing list:
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >> >> >> >> > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
> > > > >> >> >> >> >    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> --
> > > > >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>
> > > > >> >> >> >> Stevehttp://
> > >www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallenhttp://picasaweb.google...
>
> > > > >> >> >> > --
> > > > >> >> >> > Chromium Discussion mailing list:
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >> >> >> > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
> > > > >> >> >> >    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
>
> > > > >> >> >> --
> > > > >> >> >> Cheers,
> > > > >> >> >> Steve
> > > > >> >> >>http://www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallen
> > > > >> >> >>http://picasaweb.google.ca/Stephen.D.Allen
> > > > >> >> >>http://www.facebook.com/S.D.Allen
> > > > >> >> >>http://portfolio-s-d-allen.blogspot.com/
> > > > >> >> >>http://friendfeed.com/chimpanze
> > > > >> >> >>http://stephenallen.yelp.ca/
>
> > > > >> >> >> --
> > > > >> >> >> Chromium Discussion
>
> ...
>
> read more »
-- 
Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss

Reply via email to