Same here Adblock+ The problem was the amount of bookmarks, not the extension in my case. I ruled extensions out early on. 8)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, mhenriday <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for posting, Jay - that's an interesting observation ! I'm > running Adblock+ on Chromium 4.0.296.0 (35990) on my 64-bit Linux > setup, but my bookmarks load in what I accept in a reasonable amount > of time, i e, some 36 seconds.... > > Henri > > On Jan 10, 9:43 am, Jay Mendoza <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe only somewhat related, but I was having page-loading issues, >> where pages would seem to load for an extended period of time and >> would not respond to clicks or mousewheel scrolling. Disabling AdBlock >> fixed the issue. >> >> Mac build 35890 >> >> Jay >> >> On Jan 9, 11:28 pm, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Are you talking about a case where he uses the Bookmark Sync feature? if >> > so, >> > I never saw him writing that he is using it, so the network connection >> > should not a factor in this case. >> >> > ☆PhistucK >> >> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:20, mhenriday <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Again, I suspect that with the sheer number of bookmarks you have the >> > > file simply takes time to load, given the limitations of your >> > > connexion. Have you checked to see how large, in fact, your bookmarks >> > > file is and what the downstream speeds provided by your ISP really are >> > > in practice ? To take my situation as an example, he nominal >> > > downstream speed provided me by my ISP is 8Mbs, but in reality I never >> > > get more than 6.75 Mbs, which I understand is quite good for an ADSL >> > > connexion. And if the Google servers are very busy when you try to >> > > load your bookmarks, you can expect that doing so will take even more >> > > time. So I doubt that the problem lies with Chromium/Chrome - unless >> > > it's the case that your bookmarks load much more quickly from a >> > > different browser.... >> >> > > Henri >> >> > > On Jan 8, 6:14 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Well it's a 6 Mbps Residential Subscriber service and I use various >> > > > computers. This behaviour was shown in all the 'puters that I use >> > > > Chromium/Google-Chrome on so it's not hardware specific or even OS >> > > > specific as I use a mix of GNU/Linux, MSFT Windows and hardware. >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, mhenriday <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > Sorry, Steve, that I was unable to make myself clear - as I reported >> > > > > in my first posting to this thread, when I checked, I found that it >> > > > > took my 970 bookmarks 36 seconds to load. You estimated that you have >> > > > > approximately three times as many bookmarks ; thus I didn't find the >> > > > > fact that it takes about three times as long for them to load >> > > > > particularly surprising. You haven't indicated how speedy your >> > > > > internet connexion is nor provided details regarding your computer's >> > > > > performance, so it's difficult to know how your figures relate to >> > > > > mine. One thing should be certain, however ; if you significantly >> > > > > reduce the number of your bookmarks, the number that remain should >> > > > > load more quickly.... >> >> > > > > Henri >> >> > > > > On Jan 8, 5:06 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> Are you serious?! It takes you 2+ minutes to load 1/3 the amount of >> > > bookmarks? >> >> > > > >> I didn't consider that it was the amount of bookmarks as it was much >> > > > >> snapper just a day or 2 ago; but, I have added bookmarks since then. >> >> > > > >> So, I thought for giggles I'll delete all my bookmarks and see if >> > > > >> the >> > > > >> issue persists. It didn't; With all my extensions enabled >> > > > >> Chromium/Google-Chrome both launced in about a second or 2 without >> > > > >> any >> > > > >> hang. >> >> > > > >> Therefore everything else was incidental in this; I just have too >> > > > >> many bookmarks. The situation isn't really hardware specific though >> > > > >> as >> > > > >> the same issue appeared on my i7 workstation. Chrome/Chromium just >> > > > >> seems to have an issue with loading over 3k bookmarks. <shrug> >> >> > > > >> So time to "cull" the bookmarks. LOL >> >> > > > >> Thanks everyone for your input, it helped me to look elsewhere for >> > > > >> the >> > > cause. >> >> > > > >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM, mhenriday <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > Steve, I doubt it's a question of approaching an upper limit, but >> > > > >> > if >> > > > >> > you have approximately 3K bookmarks, it's not surprising that they >> > > > >> > take some time to load, depending upon your internet connexion and >> > > the >> > > > >> > capacity of your machine. What you are experiencing corresponds >> > > pretty >> > > > >> > well with what I see with approximately 1/3 as many bookmarks as >> > > > >> > you >> > > > >> > and with an ADSL connexion with a nominal downstream speed of >> > > 8Mbits/ >> > > > >> > s.... >> >> > > > >> > Henri >> >> > > > >> > On Jan 8, 4:19 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> >> Hi Tim; >> >> > > > >> >> These are the bookmarks since I started on the WWW circa '92/93 >> > > > >> >> so >> > > > >> >> about 3k. Am I approaching the upper limit, is there an upper >> > > limit? >> >> > > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Tim Steele <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> > Hi Steve, >> > > > >> >> > Out of curiousity, roughly how many bookmarks do you have? >> > > > >> >> > Tim >> > > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:16 PM, S D Allen < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> >> Yes understood. Mine are synced to -- I'm just saying the only >> > > thing >> > > > >> >> >> that has changed in terms of extensions/Chrome/Chromium is >> > > > >> >> >> that >> > > I >> > > > >> >> >> changed the syncing method from XMarks to Google and was >> > > > >> >> >> musing >> > > if >> > > > >> >> >> Google bookmark sync (application) causes the slow delay on >> > > start-up. >> > > > >> >> >> Since you don't use Google Bookmark sync I guess it's >> > > > >> >> >> difficult >> > > for >> > > > >> >> >> you to say. >> >> > > > >> >> >> Anyone else using Google to sync their bookmarks, experiencing >> > > slow >> > > > >> >> >> start up on Chromium/Google-Chrome? Just trying to figure out >> > > > >> >> >> if >> > > it's >> > > > >> >> >> something local to my setup or something else. >> >> > > > >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> > > > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, mhenriday >> > > > >> >> >> <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> >> > Steve, my testing was done with the bookmarks synced.... >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Henri >> >> > > > >> >> >> > On Jan 7, 8:46 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> >> >> Thanks for the response Mhenriday. The only thing I've >> > > changed >> > > > >> >> >> >> recently is that I reverted to using >> > > > >> >> >> >> Google Sync for my bookmarks. I deleted the XMarks >> > > > >> >> >> >> extension >> > > prior to >> > > > >> >> >> >> doing this. >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> So, I'm wondering if it's Google Sync doing this on startup >> > > .... I >> > > > >> >> >> >> notice that selecting any bookmark on the toolbar; there >> > > > >> >> >> >> is a >> > > > >> >> >> >> significant delay before the focus works. >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:17 PM, mhenriday < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Steve, on my 64-bit Ubuntu Karmic setup running Chromium >> > > 4.0.291.0 >> > > > >> >> >> >> > (35606) , my 970 Delicious bookmarks start displaying >> > > > >> >> >> >> > after >> > > a couple >> > > > >> >> >> >> > of seconds and load fully after 36 seconds. This on a HP >> > > Pavilion >> > > > >> >> >> >> > d4595se with an AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Dual Core CPU and >> > > > >> >> >> >> > 2 >> > > GB RAM.... >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Henri >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > On Jan 7, 4:11 pm, S D Allen <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> FYI: Just checked with *4.0.291.0 (35606) Ubuntu* and >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> the >> > > extensions >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> all >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> load,m (icons appear in top left) but the bookmarks >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> take a >> > > long time >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> (again >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> over 2 minutes). Again this is on Debian Sid distro. >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> This >> > > has been >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> happening >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> with the last couple of Chromium builds for me. I >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> update >> > > daily. HTH >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:01 AM, S D Allen >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Folks, I'm on Debian Linux (Sid) and lately I've >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > noticed >> > > that both >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > the >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > builds of Chromium (from Ubuntu Repository) and >> > > Developers >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Google-Chrome are quite slow when it comes to loading >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > my >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > extensions >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > AND bookmarks in the Bookmark Toolbar. >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Just now after updating to 4.0.288.1 unstable; It took >> > > over 2 >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > minutes >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > to load the bookmarks in the toolbar and the rest of >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > the >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > extensions. >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Of course the entire interface is frozen solid when >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > this >> > > happens. >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Anyone else experiencing this? >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > -- >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Cheers, >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > Steve >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallen >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://picasaweb.google.ca/Stephen.D.Allen >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://www.facebook.com/S.D.Allen >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://portfolio-s-d-allen.blogspot.com/ >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://friendfeed.com/chimpanze >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >http://stephenallen.yelp.ca/ >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> Stevehttp:// >> > >www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallenhttp://picasaweb.google... >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > -- >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Chromium Discussion mailing list: >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >> >> >> >> > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >> > > > >> >> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> -- >> > > > >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> Stevehttp:// >> > >www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallenhttp://picasaweb.google... >> >> > > > >> >> >> > -- >> > > > >> >> >> > Chromium Discussion mailing list: >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >> >> >> > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >> > > > >> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss >> >> > > > >> >> >> -- >> > > > >> >> >> Cheers, >> > > > >> >> >> Steve >> > > > >> >> >>http://www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallen >> > > > >> >> >>http://picasaweb.google.ca/Stephen.D.Allen >> > > > >> >> >>http://www.facebook.com/S.D.Allen >> > > > >> >> >>http://portfolio-s-d-allen.blogspot.com/ >> > > > >> >> >>http://friendfeed.com/chimpanze >> > > > >> >> >>http://stephenallen.yelp.ca/ >> >> > > > >> >> >> -- >> > > > >> >> >> Chromium Discussion >> >> ... >> >> read more » > > -- > Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss > -- Cheers, Steve http://www.linkedin.com/in/torontostephenallen http://picasaweb.google.ca/Stephen.D.Allen http://www.facebook.com/S.D.Allen http://portfolio-s-d-allen.blogspot.com/ http://friendfeed.com/chimpanze http://stephenallen.yelp.ca/
-- Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
