cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: KVNO of trusts Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Other types of Kerberos messages on SamLogon Generic Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] LSA and trusted domains Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: New case: SRX080910600015: [MS-ADA3]: 2.44 Elaborate on objectSid definition Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains overview (SRX080902600070) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA and trusted domains overview (SRX080902600070) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status of SRX080902600070 (trusted domains overview) and SRX080909600334 (backing store / policy) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Status of SRX080902600070 (trusted domains overview) and SRX080909600334 (backing store / policy) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status of SRX080902600070 (trusted domains overview) and SRX080909600334 (backing store / policy) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Statusupdate : (SRX080902600070 / SRX081021600181, and SRX080909600334 / SRX081013600536) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Statusupdate : (SRX080902600070 / SRX081021600181, and SRX080909600334 / SRX081013600536) Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Lack of information in MS-MCI about MSZIP Matthieu Suiche
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Lack of information in MS-MCI about MSZIP Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] Case created: [Pfif] Relationship between trusted domain object Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] What happened to SamLogon validation level 4? Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] What happened to SamLogon validation level 4? Sebastian Canevari
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] What happened to SamLogon validation level 4? Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] What are the POLICY_DOMAIN_KERBEROS_TICKET_INFO flags? Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] What are the POLICY_DOMAIN_KERBEROS_TICKET_INFO flags? Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] What are the POLICY_DOMAIN_KERBEROS_TICKET_INFO flags? Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] What are the POLICY_DOMAIN_KERBEROS_TICKET_INFO flags? Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] What are the POLICY_DOMAIN_KERBEROS_TICKET_INFO flags? Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 601488 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Secret 'last set times' doc incorrect in 2008 - 600578 Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] How are 'supported enc types' determined in trusts? - 600253 Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] LSA LookupSids 3 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA LookupSids 3 John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA LookupSids 3 John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA LookupSids 3 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA LookupSids 3 John Dunning
• Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options John Dunning
  • RE: Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options John Dunning
  • RE: [Pfif] Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options John Dunning
  • RE: Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options John Dunning
  • RE: Subject: [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] Re: Answer: SRX080626600802 : WINS administrative RPC interface Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Request for fix to MS-PAC ronnie sahlberg
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Request for fix to MS-PAC Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Request for fix to MS-PAC Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Request for fix to MS-PAC ronnie sahlberg
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Request for fix to MS-PAC Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Request for fix to MS-PAC Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Request for fix to MS-PAC ronnie sahlberg
• [cifs-protocol] CAR - NTCreateX options tridge
• [cifs-protocol] 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 601628 RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] New doc version notifications? Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: New doc version notifications? Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] Generic passthrough gpInput1 mis-named. Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Generic passthrough gpInput1 mis-named. Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Generic passthrough gpInput1 mis-named. Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] Backing store linkage for MS-NRPC, trust account details Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding String2key for random trust keys ([MS-ADTS] 7.1.6.8.1.2) John Dunning
• [cifs-protocol] How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON SRX080918600905 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON SRX080918600905 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON SRX080918600905 Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON SRX080918600905 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON SRX080918600905 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How to validate the PAC in NETLOGON SRX080918600905 Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Re: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] Response (document change proposals): raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Response (document change proposals): raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Response (document change proposals): raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Response (document change proposals): raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO (SRX080803600053) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: (More): Status: SRX080803600053: [MS-NLMP] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] salt used for various principal types Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types Richard Guthrie
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600634 - RE: salt used for various principal types Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Adam Simpkins
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Status: raw NTLMSSP tokens in GSS-API/SPNEGO? SRX080803600053 Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] trustAuthIncoming format Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: trustAuthIncoming format Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: trustAuthIncoming format Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: trustAuthIncoming format Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: trustAuthIncoming format Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] string2key for random trust keys Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: string2key for random trust keys Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] Relationship between trusted domain object Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] Relationship between trusted domain object Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] Relationship between trusted domain object Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Case created: [Pfif] Relationship between trusted domain object Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Case created: [Pfif] Relationship between trusted domain object Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] The Abstract Data Modal Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] The Abstract Data Modal tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] The Abstract Data Modal Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Bitfields Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bitfields tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Bitfields Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly Message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from The Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly message from the Technical Committee Ron Schnell
  • [cifs-protocol] Monthly Message from the Technical Committee Ron Schnell
• [cifs-protocol] Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication John Dunning
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication John Dunning
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 3.4.5.1 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Bill Wesse
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Hongwei Sun

• Earlier messages
• Later messages