cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• • RE: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPIwith AES Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPIwith AES Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPIwith AES Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPIwith AES Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPIwith AES Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [Pfif] [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPIwith AES Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify AEAD behaviour for GSSAPI with AES Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] DCE_STYLE, AES and sequence numbers Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DCE_STYLE, AES and sequence numbers Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Richard Guthrie
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Re: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Re: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Richard Guthrie
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Richard Guthrie
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Richard Guthrie
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Richard Guthrie
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: 600169 - RE: DCE/RPC PFC_SUPPORT_HEADER_SIGN not optional Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Hongwei Sun
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Session keys are not always 16 bytes long Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Recall: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Recall: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 601115 - RE: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: 601115 - RE: LSA trusted domains enumeration (for n=0) Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] AD schema outsid the PDF? Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: AD schema outsid the PDF? Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: AD schema outsid the PDF? Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: AD schema outsid the PDF? Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: AD schema outsid the PDF? Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] AD schema outsid the PDF? Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Mapping of MS-LSAD onto LDAP and DRS replications Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] 602144 RE: CDAP netlogon and 'implementation defined' behaviour Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: 602144 RE: CDAP netlogon and 'implementation defined' behaviour Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 602144 RE: CDAP netlogon and 'implementation defined' behaviour Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 602144 RE: CDAP netlogon and 'implementation defined' behaviour Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR Partial Attribute Set Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR Partial Attribute Set Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR EXOP_REPL_OBJ Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Correction, assistance request: MS-DRSR EXOP_REPL_OBJ Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SRX080521601320 : xtra response formats for 'netlogon' on mailslots Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SRX080521601320 : xtra response formats for 'netlogon' on mailslots Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] 600146 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: 600146 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: 600146 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] RE: CDAP netlogon and 'implementation defined' behaviour Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CDAP netlogon and 'implementation defined' behaviour Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] correction to SMB SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO info level James Peach
  • [cifs-protocol] correction to SMB SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO info level robert . hinchliff
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] correction to SMB SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO info level Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Jeremy Allison
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Answer: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] Closing: SRX080609601575 : [MS-ADA3]: 2.43 2.44 string forms of AD attributes Bill Wesse
• [cifs-protocol] FW: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: SNTP issues Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SNTP issues Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 600422 RE: SNTP issues Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SNTP issues Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SNTP issues Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] SNTP issues Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 600548 RE: SNTP issues Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: 600548 RE: SNTP issues Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Re: 600548 RE: SNTP issues Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SNTP issues Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] String and binary forms of attributes Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] String and binary forms of attributes Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Richard Guthrie
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Richard Guthrie
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Richard Guthrie
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • 600300 RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Richard Guthrie
  • Re: 600300 RE: [cifs-protocol] format of password attributes in AD Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken , NT20Token Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken , NT20Token Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Expected values for Ntversion , lmNTToken , NT20Token Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] S46 test - should ioctl invalid code error code be in spec? tridge
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] S46 test - should ioctl invalid code error code be in spec? Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] CAR - missing documentation on *SMBSERVER in SMB and SMB2 Steve French
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: CAR - missing documentation on *SMBSERVER in SMB and SMB2 Steve French
• [cifs-protocol] Response for format of SMB2 ExtA request in create Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: Specific sockaddr layout in MS-ADTS 7.3.1.7 Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] Registry Setting to change NTP clients not to run as 'symmetric active' Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Registry Setting to change NTP clients not to run as 'symmetric active' Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Registry Setting to change NTP clients not to run as 'symmetric active' Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Registry Setting to change NTP clients not to run as 'symmetric active' Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 602322 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Andrew Bartlett
  • [cifs-protocol] 600606 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 600606 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Andrew Bartlett
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] 601583 RE: How are disabled accounts handled in SNTP Richard Guthrie
• [cifs-protocol] CAR - missing SMB2 GetFileInfo levels tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 GetFileInfo levels (SRX080531600045) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 GetFileInfo levels Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] Create Context Tags Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] Create Access Mask Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: Create Access Mask tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] rules for valid filenames in SMB and SMB2? Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] rules for valid filenames in SMB and SMB2? George Colley
  • [cifs-protocol] NTLMSSP Flags field have a reserved bit that is set by XP George Colley
  • [cifs-protocol] SMB2 Create - CreateOptions George Colley
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] rules for valid filenames in SMB and SMB2? Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: Create Access Mask Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 GetFileInfo levels Hongwei Sun
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 GetFileInfo levels Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] CAR - missing SMB2 SetFileInfo levels tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 SetFileInfo levels (SRX080531600044) Bill Wesse
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 SetFileInfo levels Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - missing SMB2 SetFileInfo levels Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] tutorial on how to use gentest SMB/SMB2 test tool tridge
• [cifs-protocol] upcoming events tridge
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2 signing tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing Sebastian Canevari
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 signing tridge
  • [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB2 create access masks Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] fields returned by SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO call Jeff Layton
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] fields returned by SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO call George Colley
• [cifs-protocol] Linux CIFS performance Steve French
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [linux-cifs-client] Linux CIFS performance Jeremy Allison
  • [cifs-protocol] Re: [linux-cifs-client] Linux CIFS performance Dave Kleikamp
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Re: [linux-cifs-client] Linux CIFS performance Lam Hoang
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Re: [linux-cifs-client] Linux CIFS performance Steve French
  • RE: [cifs-protocol] Re: [linux-cifs-client] Linux CIFS performance Steve French
  • [cifs-protocol] POSIX pathnames and the '\' character. Jeremy Allison

• Earlier messages
• Later messages