But.........I also understood the issues to be about shows. The CKCSC has their own show venue......with certain rules, one being no pro handlers. Alot of people wanted to keep the shows run the way they were.....and this would not have been possible if the CKCSC was the AKC parent club. Some people do enjoy having both venues to compete in. pam
----- Original Message ----- From: Susan A. Schlenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] IIA 3/not a new amendment > Thanks for the clarification, Kathy, > I do believe that is right. However, I would be very loathe to see the > "issue" come to a vote without a real definition of parameters > concerning what a "yes" or "no" vote meant. I understand that the vote > last time was not "would the CKCSC, USA members like to form a parent > club to steward the breed as it moved into AKC recognition" but rather > "would the members like AKC recognition"; a moot point as the breed was > going to be recognized with or without a vote. So, in my mind, it > matters not who voted for or against because the vote was entirely on a > moot issue. > If the issue was defined by a neutral party as I suggested either in a > setting of mediation or even if CKCSC, USA acted alone in this, it would > most advantageous. > > Suze ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
