Hi, Pam,
I'm confused as to what you are addressing in my comments below?
Surely, people like showing in both venues. I'm not sure what that has
to do with the issue of breeding and registration vis a vis AKC only
dogs? The question put to a vote back then was not "would you like to
preserve shows without pro handlers?", (and perhaps those who do would
like to show in UKC), but rather "would you like the breed to be
recognized by AKC?". That is tantamount to my asking for a vote on
"would you like it if Microsoft didn't make software?".
So far as I'm aware, the CKCSC, USA as it is today can still prohibit
pro handlers if they wish while allowing in AKC only dogs. I think that
this is apples and oranges.
Suze
PAMoesinger wrote:
>
> But.........I also understood the issues to be about shows. The CKCSC has
> their own show venue......with certain rules, one being no pro handlers.
> Alot of people wanted to keep the shows run the way they were.....and this
> would not have been possible if the CKCSC was the AKC parent club. Some
> people do enjoy having both venues to compete in.
> pam
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Susan A. Schlenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] IIA 3/not a new amendment
>
> > Thanks for the clarification, Kathy,
> > I do believe that is right. However, I would be very loathe to
> see the
> > "issue" come to a vote without a real definition of parameters
> > concerning what a "yes" or "no" vote meant. I understand that the vote
> > last time was not "would the CKCSC, USA members like to form a parent
> > club to steward the breed as it moved into AKC recognition" but rather
> > "would the members like AKC recognition"; a moot point as the breed was
> > going to be recognized with or without a vote. So, in my mind, it
> > matters not who voted for or against because the vote was entirely on a
> > moot issue.
> > If the issue was defined by a neutral party as I suggested either
> in a
> > setting of mediation or even if CKCSC, USA acted alone in this, it would
> > most advantageous.
> >
> > Suze
>
> =========================================================
> "Magic Commands":
> to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
> to start it up gain click here:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>
> E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
> Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>
> All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
--
Suze at Llawen Cavaliers
"...I have seen that in any great undertaking it is not enough for a man
to depend simply upon himself." -Isna Ia-wica
"Thought comes before speech" Luther Standing Bear
=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
