I was just commenting that there were other issues involved to consider that encompassed whether or not the CKCSC should be the parent club.....shows being one, not just registering and breeding issues. All of these things should have been taken into consideration when people voted. I read your post as if breeding and registering were the main things to think about. Maybe I read it incorrectly. pam ----- Original Message ----- From: Susan A. Schlenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:30 PM Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] IIA 3/not a new amendment
> Hi, Pam, > I'm confused as to what you are addressing in my comments below? > Surely, people like showing in both venues. I'm not sure what that has > to do with the issue of breeding and registration vis a vis AKC only > dogs? The question put to a vote back then was not "would you like to > preserve shows without pro handlers?", (and perhaps those who do would > like to show in UKC), but rather "would you like the breed to be > recognized by AKC?". That is tantamount to my asking for a vote on > "would you like it if Microsoft didn't make software?". > So far as I'm aware, the CKCSC, USA as it is today can still prohibit > pro handlers if they wish while allowing in AKC only dogs. I think that > this is apples and oranges. > > Suze ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
