I've tried both ways, giving the restricted papers with the puppy and
hanging onto the papers until I got proof of spay/neuter. Neither will stop
a really determined person.
All the best,
Susan Cochran


----- Original Message -----
From: "Winnie Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: [CKCS-L] puppy buyers


> >  I've used both of your suggestions in the past Winnie, but this couple
was a
> >  new experience for me.
>
> In your case, I think you were lucky that the buyers actually told you
> their intention rather than taking the dog and then breeding it anyway.
> (And we all know that's happened - restrictions or not).
>
> When I bought my male, he was sold as restricted.  I was not given
> the actual registration papers until I supplied proof of neuter.  I know
> that wouldn't stop some people, but if they want to register
> resulting puppies they'll need those papers.  Would that work for you?
>
> On the other hand, if buyers are determined, they will just out-right lie.
> It's a shame, and makes me glad I'm not a breeder.
>
> Winnie
> Columbus, NC
>
> =========================================================
> "Magic Commands":
> to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
> to start it up gain click here:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>
>  E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
> Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>
> All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to