en smalltalk podes hacer cosas más desprolijas que en c? que en c++? que en java?? no me lo creo... no entiendo por qué, qué cosas más desprolijas podés hacer?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Rusty <[email protected]> wrote: > > No sé si es lo que lo mató, o si siquiera está muerto. > Pero si sé que estoy de acuerdo con el comentario. > > Smalltalk es el paraíso de los buenos programadores. > Pero también es el paraíso para el desprolijo y el que ata con > alambre. > Y eso último es jo-di-do. > > Salutes. > > Rusty. > > On 10 nov, 10:31, GallegO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Se desato una discusion en el blog de cincom y rescato un comentario > > que quiero compartir: > > > > Completo enhttp://bit.ly/Uu517 > > > > ...but I think the context of the quote is being misinterpreted > > somewhat. My impression from the video wasn't that Bob was > > misrepresenting Cunningham's meaning, but just that he wasn't > > explaining it very well. > > 'What killed Smalltalk is that it was just too easy to make a mess." > > I think that's absolutely true, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. > > The truth is that in Smalltalk it's often easier to do anything, both > > good and bad. It's rather like saying that the problem with a > > motorcycle, compared to a bicycle, is that it's just too easy to go > > too fast and wreck one. With programming languages, as with bikes, if > > you give a powerful tool to an undisciplined, inexperienced user, they > > can cause a lot of damage. > > If the only vehicle you give someone is a one-gear bicycle with street > > tires and training wheels, it'll be really hard for them to hurt > > themselves, but they're never going to go very far or very fast, > > either. > > > > Saludos > > GallegO > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] http://www.clubSmalltalk.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
