Dwight,

How did the Kirby 25 do against the 37R upwind, and was the 37R well sailed in 
general?

Was the Kirby "hitch'n a ride" on the 37's stern wave?

Best regards,

Martin
Calypso
1971 C&C 43
Seattle

From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of dwight
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 1:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Stus-List Kirby 25 verses C&C 37R

Yea that Kirby 25 was a lively little boat and well equipped with "go fast" 
gear.  I don't think we were planing but certainly up to hull speed alongside 
that 37R...a huge contrast in spinnakers there, a fractional rig triradial kite 
on the Kirby (3/4 fractional I think) and masthead triradial on the 37R, we 
felt very small.  Bob was driving and Glenn and I trimmed, and I needed relief, 
glad we had that new head on board that day...that must have been even more 
perplexing for the 37R, man goes below and forward and still they can't pull 
away...I guess all the work I thought I was doing in the cockpit did not really 
matter anyway!!!

________________________________
From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck S
Sent: March 10, 2014 5:32 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Kirby 25 verses C&C 37R

Great story.
Some boats can be exceptional.  Some crews can make a good boat even faster.  
You guys sound like you knew what you were doing.  Sometimes the planets allign 
and a good boat w good sails and a crew who trim them well, make a huge 
difference.
Chuck
Resolute
1990 C&C 34R
Atlantic City, NJ
________________________________
From: "Robert Abbott" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 12:41:20 PM
Subject: Stus-List Kirby 25 verses C&C 37R
Chuck:

This particular K25 was a fast boat.....as I mentioned in an earlier post, it 
was stripped out and made race ready at the Bruckmann factory in 
Mississauga.....even after all of the work Mark Bruckmann did to the K25, it 
was class legal.  For example, he had the bottom 'long sanded' and the foils 
were made 'perfect'.  The sails were made by Hugh Beaton of the North Sails 
loft in Toronto.....if anyone could make sails for a K25, it is Hugh Beaton.

When I was in the process of buying the K25 from Mark Bruckmann, I asked him to 
install a 'marine head' in the vee berth before he shipped the boat to 
me.....he had the ways and means to do it a lot better that me.  I though at 
that moment he would not sell  the boat to me because he said it would slow it 
down.

Well, the J24 fleet around here called us 'the annoying red Kirby'....we were 
beating them boat for boat most days.  One day in early August, we hauled the 
K25 on the club's crane to clean the bottom and a few of the J24 racers took 
the opportunity to come over to inspect her.....they asked what modifications 
had been done to the boat to make it so fast.....I told them I had had a 
'marine 'head' install in the vee berth complete with thru hulls.  Needless to 
say, they went away totally perplexed.

The downwind run against the 37R, Dwight leaves the cockpit and has a dump in 
the head.....the first to use it for that purpose.....too funny!

On another race, we were dueling boat for boat with a J24 to the finish 
line....long story but he came up and bumped us and cried foul.....I accepted 
the foul and did a 360 or 720, can't remember exactly, and we still beat the 
J24 across the line.  There was no way the J24's could deal with this K25 
downwind.  Dwight might remember that race and finish....I am pretty sure he 
was on board.

Rob Abbott
AZURA
C&C 32 - 84
Halifax, N.S.


On 2014/03/08 7:42 PM, dwight wrote:
Chuck

I was on Bob and Glen's K25 as rail meat I guess because at that time in my 
life I could add a  lot to rail meat and we were not planing, just holding our 
own downwind with a C&C 37R...good wind but not planing for us as I 
recall...maybe Bob will remember better, cause I was in the head for some of 
it, think I may have been the first to use that head and that left he a Glen in 
control...but it was downwind so they did not really need me and maybe my 
weight forward was advantageous, who knows...think I might have been the first 
to use the new head that Bob installed on that slippery little K25, 40 Yard3 
Bin that was her name and she was swift that's for sure and we had a lot of fun 
with that boat...I would recommend a K25 to anyone with racing aspirations

________________________________
From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck S
Sent: March 8, 2014 11:50 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Stus-List Kirby 25 verses C&C 37R

Hi Dwight,
I imagine the Kirby 25 was planing and surfing while you guys were not able to?

I hate when they put planing boats in with our division, but that's PHRF.  
Melges 20, Melges 24, but the most impressive thing was an all carbon Viper 640 
that even led the fleet to the windward mark in 4 knot wind and gained a little 
on each leg, especially downwind.

Chuck
Resolute
1990 C&C 34R
Atlantic City, NJ
________________________________
From: "dwight" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 10:04:05 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Boat Names
K25, which was a really slippery little boat, raced side by side with a C&C 37R 
in goods winds under spinnaker on a long run in from Chebucto Head and we held 
our own easy...only 3 of us onboard that day...very memorable day...First in 
Class I seem to recall...Bob may have a say on that day too




_______________________________________________

This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album

http://www.cncphotoalbum.com

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
[email protected]

Reply via email to