SEZ9 commented on PR #12592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12592#issuecomment-6378579901

   @hutiefang76 thanks for the pointers against `cb6ae01c`, that makes this 
much easier to follow.
   
   **F1** – noted that `reconvertTimestampType` is intended to preserve the 
declared scale, including `TIMESTAMP_NS`, and that the native-DDL test and sink 
round trip cover it. I will verify that against the diff before marking it 
resolved. On other sinks consuming the scale through their own converters: the 
original concern was the auto-DDL change for every DuckDB-to-X pipeline, so I 
would still like the upgrade note to call that out explicitly.
   
   Your comment appears to have been cut off right at the upgrade-note link, so 
I only see the F1 part. Could you re-post the rest? Specifically, I still need 
to confirm:
   
   - **F4** – does the upgrade note now state that a plain DuckDB `TIMESTAMP` 
produces MySQL `DATETIME(6)` instead of `DATETIME`?
   - **F2 / F6** – is the pre-epoch alias path (JVM-default-zone 
`getTimestamp`) now guarded, and is there a test pinning the two documented 
limitations (pre-1970 DST gap, Gregorian-cutover date)?
   - **F3 / F8** – have the one-time WARN and the Javadoc been reworded so they 
no longer hard-code the driver version, and does the Javadoc state that the 
metadata-based detection is version-independent?
   - **F5 / F7** – has the per-cell `ResultSetMetaData` lookup / `Calendar` 
allocation been hoisted out of the hot read path (e.g. resolved once per result 
set)?
   
   If any of these are already in `cb6ae01c`, links like the ones you gave for 
F1 are all I need; if some are intentionally deferred, just say so and I will 
note it.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:1982 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to