בשבת, 4 באוקטובר 2003, 19:14, נכתב על ידי Simon Oosthoek: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:43:07PM +0000, Diego Iastrubni wrote: > > I agree. Also seeing "rc4" "beta2" on a running system does look bad. > > A "security update" or just "update" will be a good idea IMHO. > > I'm sure the final of 9.2 will have no sign of a RC on oo.o 1.1 (that was > the case on the rc2 of 9.2) I don't know for sure, but I think rc5 was > picked up before the CDs reached their master state for duplication. I'm > confident that no average end user will notice anything of the fact that > it's actually a RC and not the renamed 1.1 final. that is not what I am talking about. Even in rc19 is exactly final, it's nice to have an rpm which is named final. It looks better for the "ignorant public".
> I believe all this was already mentioned in this thread or another, so I > guess I'm falling for a troll ;-) > > Cheers > > Simon -- diego, 9 Tishrey 5764 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
