I agree. Also seeing "rc4" "beta2" on a running system does look bad. A "security update" or just "update" will be a good idea IMHO.
בשבת, 4 באוקטובר 2003, 18:29, נכתב על ידי Keld Jørn Simonsen: > Could the updated OOo 1.1.0 be relaesed as an update? > I am sure they fixed a number of things between RC 4 and the 1.1.0 > > best regards > keld > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:26:24AM -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > > I would fully support to rename the packages if still possible. Just get > > the RC out of the package names (rpm names). It is still named RC4 in > > cooker > > Tom > > > > On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 21:25, Rob wrote: > > > On Saturday 04 October 2003 00:06, Han Boetes wrote: > > > > > I don't know which RC ended up in 9.2, but RC5 and 1.1 are > > > > > identical. Might as well just rename the package, if it's > > > > > RC5. > > > > > > > > Allas. CD's are read-only. > > > > > > The CD's have already gone to duplication? Cool! Show me the > > > torrents ;) > > > > > > Rob -- diego, 9 Tishrey 5764 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
