Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96

[Pixel]

Tim McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've read about 2.96 and after
> experimenting with it I'm dead set against it.

seems like redhat managed to build their full distro with it, so C++ is not dead
broke. We tried once already to put gcc 2.96 but it broke too much to be kept.
If this new gcc 2.96 (with redhat's patch) still breaks a lot of things, it's
going to be removed for sure!