Bryan Paxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why is mandrake going to a cvs snapshot of gcc ? > You would think of all the much about redhat doing so, you'd think more than > twice about a move like this. > And even statement(I'd more likely call it an advisory) from the gcc team ? If you notice we have the flag and not [CHRPM] and not [FROZEN-CHRPM] that mean it for cooker not for frozen install. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org Paris, France --Chmouel
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Thomas M. Beaudry
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk (note on optimi... Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
