On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > At this point though isn't cooker basically 7.2? how are we supposed to > > be > > 7.2 is gold (or nearly) now. So cooker will now receive more updates and > will be less stable... Yeah - that's where the confusion with me and apparently some others lies, no one had mentioned that the cooker and 7.2beta dirs were branched and that 7.2beta wasn't cooker anymore.
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Thomas M. Beaudry
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk (note on optimi... Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Antony Suter
- [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96 Thierry Vignaud
