It's mildly tempting to make a substantive reply to your continued nonsense. But I said I was bowing out, and so I am ;). None of your rebuttals are worth the continued effort anyway, Juan. My time is better spent doing ANYTHING else.
I do appreciate the props on my old comments on propaganda :) take care John > On Oct 17, 2016, at 11:30 AM, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:18:26 -0400 > John Newman <j...@synfin.org> wrote: > >> >>>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:13 PM, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've never seen you make any interesting technical points, >>> >>> So now you changed from "technical points" to "interesting >>> technical points" >>> >>> You don't need to further embarras yourself, but you are >>> likely to…. >> >> Playing simple word games, Juan? That seems about your speed. >> My point remains the same, and un-refuted. > > > You don't have a point. By the way, as far as I can tell your > second post to this list is about....the global warming scam. Go > figure. At least counting posts coming from synfin.org. > > Now, feel free to link all your 'technical', 'relevant' and > 'useful' posts to the list. Especially 'technical'. Not that you > are under any obligation to post pseudo technical garbage, but > since apparently you love it so much, one would expect you to > post a lot of it? Seems not. Tsk tsk. > > Then again, I'm glad you don't practice what you preach =) > > >> >>> >>>> >>>> or anything else. When it comes to tor you're like a fucking broken >>>> IRC bot, spouting the SAME SHIT WE ALL KNOW, >>> >>> Oh really. >> >> Yep. > > "We" all know. So who is "we"? Whose spokesperson are you? Or > whose talking head? > > Ah yes, since you can't speak for yourself you now invoke some > kind of imaginary gang. Or perhaps you are referring to the > 'community' of corrupt 'hackers' and the like, on the > pentagon's payroll? Of course "you all" know that... > > > >> >>> >>> >>> Nobody seems to know what I'm saying. If they did, they >>> would act otherwise. Oh wait, they are complicit? >> >> Everyone knows. > > > You can't answer the question...Or don't want to =) > > >> Everyone with half a fucking brain. If they don’t, >> it’s only because you’ve obscured the real issues with tor > > > Oh, now it's my fault. My powers are amazing eh. Just because > of some messages I post in a couple of small lists, I've > turned the whole world into complicit assholes. I must be jesus > or something - that's why I have superpowers! > > And what are the 'real' issues according to you anyway? Not that > tor is a scam funded by the pentagon eh? That's not a real > issue I guess...? Or is that the issue I've 'obscured'? Or what. > > Yeah, not expecting you to say anything reasonable at this > point... > > > >> with your >> over the top TORBOT TORBOT TORBOT responses any time the >> word is mentioned. > > > You are starting to sound like a torbot john. You were a tor > accomplice too, no? > > > >> >>> >>>> I've seen your posts, they are not technical in nature. >>> >>> Hey stupid piece of shit, this list is about crpyo ANARCHY. >> >> Right, but I’m talking about your hatred for the CRYPTO list, you ass. > > > And I'm talking about a bunch of censors and establishment > clowns pretending to be against it. I can also talk about your > love for a bunch of censors. So? > > > > >> >>> >>>> You >>>> don't have to be such a defensive ass about it, but hey, you think >>>> climate change is a hoax too, so I'd say you are basically a >>>> fucking lost cause at this point. >>> >>> >>> I say you are an ignorant nerd who thinks that any sort of >>> pseudo technical bullshit is Holy Science. You are just a >>> recycled christian. >> >> You like to use the word nerd to describe anyone interested in >> technical matters? > > > No, I'm using it that way with you. Looks like you can't even > read? I bothered to qualify "nerd" for your especial kind =) > > > > > >>> >>> Pro censorship peie of shit, parroting pro-censorship >>> propaganda in 'cryto' 'anarchsit' circles. >>> >>> You are a…hoax. >> >> >> I never said anything pro-censorship. > > > Except for supporting the censoring 'policies' of the > 'cryptography' mailing cesspool. Come on. You can't be that > stupid...or dishonest. > > >> >> I said YOU DONT GET TO DECIDE HOW OTHER PEOPLE CONFIGURE >> THEIR SOFTWARE. It’s not UP TO YOU, jackass. I’ve never endorsed >> moderation for this list. > > Not for this list. Did I say you endorse it for this list? No I > didn't, lying retard. On the other hand, have you talked > against people like quinn? Well you didn't do that either... > > At any rate, you endorse it for the 'cryptography' mailing list. > So how retarded can you be to say something in one message and > try to deny it in the next one? > > "OTHER PEOPLE CONFIGURE THEIR SOFTWARE" > > Isn't software 'free'? Oh, 'free' software gives 'admins' the > divine right to censorship. You make so much sense... > > > >> >> And parroting the lines others have just thrown at you gets you no >> points (“You are a… hoax”) > > > You are a hoax John. A pro-censorship hoax. Oh wait, I can't > use that line? It's been copyright by the PDF Philosopher > Mirimir? Sorry, please don't sue! > > > >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> At any rate, your reaction to russian propaganda doesn't speak >>>>> too well of you, just like it doesn't speak too well of Google >>>>> Inc. representatives. >>>> >>>> And your reaction speaks volumes about you. First you replied by >>>> immediately throwing your comrades under the bus, >>> >>> Except they are not my comrades. >> >> The list archives would seem to say otherwise. > > > No, only liars say otherwise. > > Here's my take on russia...qouted by one "John Newman". And > agreed with! =) > > https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2016-June/029267.html > > > By the way, first you accuse me of being part of a circle jerk > that posts russian propaganda. But if deny it (and you know the > accusation is false), then I'm throwing my comrades under the > bus. So whether I am pro-russia...or not...I'm guilty anyway =) > > You should get a job as state prosecutor... > > >> >>> >>>> now you seem to >>>> want back in the circle jerk? >>> >>> What about you don't having a clue, and either not >>> understanding my position or just lying about it. >>> >>> Bottom line you are way more pro amerikka thatn I'm pro >>> russia. Hardly surprising sice you are an americunt. >> >> You argue like a child. I’m “more pro-america” than you are >> “pro-russia”… which is utter fucking bullshit, and I think you know >> it. Show one time I’ve ever endorsed america. > > > You seem to be trying the "everybody is as bad as the U.S." > line. > > If that's not the case, you could have dealt with the stuff Zen > posts in a rational way. You didn't. Your mistake. > > > >>> >>> >>>> >>>> This entire thread is such a fucking waste of time. >>> >>> >>> So go fuck yourself. I'm sure you can write a three line >>> bash script to hack the NSA. Go for it. >> >> Same to you Juan :) > > > I'm not delusional and think the NSA can be 'hacked' =) > > > > >> >> Is there ANYONE on this list that you haven’t gotten into a massive >> flame war with? Anyone besides your Russian Alex-Jones-loving >> “global warming is a hoax" comrades, I mean…. You have to ask >> yourself, when its you against EVERYONE, is the problem really with >> EVERYONE else, or is the problem, perhaps, with YOU ? > > > Oh yes. I'm not "well adapted" to your circle jerk of fake > 'hackers' on the pentagon's payroll and Leading Establishment > Americunts like those of the crypto ML. > > > You want people to parrot only what the gang leaders allow to > be parroted eh John? That's the reason why you 'love' the fully > censored 'cryptography' mailing list =) > > >> >> I’m done talking to you. Respond if you want, but I’m not wasting >> any more time on your fucking nonsense. > > > At least it makes more sense than your own nonsense =) > > Like I said, now show what amazing hacker you are and how you > are going to hack the pentagon...Focus on the 'technical' > stuff... > > > >> >> >> John >