All of this is outside the scope of -legal. If you want to discuss this, please bring this to -project.
Thanks. Paul On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Paul van der Vlis <p...@vandervlis.nl> wrote: > Op 31-03-15 om 22:40 schreef Paul Tagliamonte: >> Please re-read my last mail on this thread. >> >> This conversation is going in circles. > > I bring 4 new points in the discussion in this mail. > > 1: > >>> I've spoken to the developer and he does not want the name of his >>> program into this discussion. In his opinion the question is clear. >>> He thinks it would make the name of his new program "dirty". > > 2: > >>> I think you can say: Debian does not want any software at this moment >>> what's not "free as in beer". > > 3: > >>> The problem is, that such software does not fit in any of the existing >>> repositories. The correct place of this program would be in "main", but >>> people expect "free as in beer" software there. Myself included. > > 4: > >> Do you know an example of software what is distributed by Debian when >> it's clear the development team behind it, doesn't want that? > > With regards, > Paul van der Vlis. > > > -- > Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen > http://www.vandervlis.nl -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cao6p2qqd65tpvwvtefunvfdue8wvmt2kc1goq8vo0e-g3ov...@mail.gmail.com
