Hi Mike,

> In my view Delphi days are numbered. Glad I saw the light a few years ago
> and moved to C#. Still do some Delphi work, but C# now dominates. 

Good for you. For me, Delphi demand has been increasing the past few years.

> Funny how in this list contributors have rubbished VB. It has been 
> around for what seems a 100 years and still going strong. 

Funny you should mention that: I was about to say the same thing about 
Delphi...

> Everyone has praised Delphi, where is it heading to now? 
> The scrap heap. Exactly where VB should have gone.

Do you see a pattern?

> Do what I did, look at where the demand is and move on. 

Or stick to where the demand is ;-)

> Also the arguments for Delphi open source should be ignored.

That's one thing we may agree on: I believe Delphi should be 
commercially managed by a company who gives full focus to Delphi and 
Delphi developers. Not to ALM. But not by going open source, please.

> Move on, learn C++, C# or VB and prepare for the inevitable. This is where
> the opportunities are. Not, and unfortunately with Delphi. It has already
> been on a slow death after D7, let it die peacefully and be remembered with
> Fortran, Assembler and Cobol as an excuse to have a public holiday to
> commemorate what they achieved in their times. 

Au contraire; let the spin-off be a start to grow the Delphi market even 
more.

> We must accept these changes and stop holding on to what we loved and move
> on. If you don't want to, then the version of Delphi you have can still
> create eze's and may create a short term earning solution for you.

Again, the same thing can be said about VB and MFC. While there will be 
new versions of Delphi, that I'm sure of.

> Mike

Groetjes,
           Bob Swart

-- 
Bob Swart Training & Consultancy (eBob42.com)  Forever Loyal to Delphi
Blog: http://www.drbob42.com/blog - RSS: http://drbob42.com/weblog.xml
__________________________________________________
Delphi-Talk mailing list -> [email protected]
http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi-talk

Reply via email to